Question about the trucks engine physics
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
Some overall code refinements would be super cool to allow engines with varrying torques to rev correctly, but could a quick and dirty solution be reached by simply introducing something like "engine_resistance: [X]" to the engine .sii, allowing modders to fine tune the revving characteristics on a per engine basis, or are there too many independent calculations done in the base game effecting engine rev to use a single multiplier?
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
this is not that dirty solution and, to be honest, i planned to add something like resistance_torque to define this behavior per engine basis and clean up the issue. if made by separate value it can be used to emulate older or technically bit different engines as well (if you can obtain such data )
cannot confirm that it will be done before next big update though ..
cannot confirm that it will be done before next big update though ..
Nobody can tell you anything about it. Those who know about it aren't allowed to talk. And those who talk know nothing.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: 14 Jan 2016 16:33
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
This next big update people are talking about last few days... anything else except Michelin tyres(tires?)?
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
Those look to be a DLC. Probably no relation to an upcoming game update.
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
The Michelin DLC is only for ETS2.
I'm also curious if the next big update is in 1.6 or in the 1.7 version.
I'm also curious if the next big update is in 1.6 or in the 1.7 version.
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
big update is by (my) definition when the second number changes.
so 1.6 will be big, while 1.5.12.487 wont ..
so 1.6 will be big, while 1.5.12.487 wont ..
Nobody can tell you anything about it. Those who know about it aren't allowed to talk. And those who talk know nothing.
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
sorry, for necro the thread, but i would like you to look on current betas if we managed to handle the issues somewhat.
engine resistance param was added, defaulted from volume (not torque).
through this power progression with throttle could be better tweaked.
in addition engine inertia is also based on volume.
with all these internal changes consumption was re-balanced also.
engine resistance param was added, defaulted from volume (not torque).
through this power progression with throttle could be better tweaked.
in addition engine inertia is also based on volume.
with all these internal changes consumption was re-balanced also.
Nobody can tell you anything about it. Those who know about it aren't allowed to talk. And those who talk know nothing.
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
Thanks. I think why consumption increased again.Max wrote:with all these internal changes consumption was re-balanced also.
- kriechbaum
- Posts: 813
- Joined: 07 Nov 2013 14:35
Re: Question about the trucks engine physics
Hi,
As i said in the other topic about 1.6 beta patch Max, for me it's very nice now. The engine has a better feeling. It's a good idea to make the inertia with the volume of the engine.
Thanks again.
As i said in the other topic about 1.6 beta patch Max, for me it's very nice now. The engine has a better feeling. It's a good idea to make the inertia with the volume of the engine.
Thanks again.