does using more aerodynamic trucks, Aero covers for the tires, 6x2 Chassis(less driveline & rolling resistance), or Super Singles(Wide Base Tires) improve fuel economy at all?
side note: the 625hp/2,050lb-ft engine I don't seem to see any improvement over the 500hp/1,650lb-ft engine when it comes to pulling even the heaviest loads, am I not seeing something or just haven't found a steep enough grade where this engine shines?
Fuel Economy Options.
- Boeing73FLY
- Posts: 447
- Joined: 11 Jun 2013 00:00
- Location: Kalos, Pokémon world -- Las Vegas, NV, USA, Earth
- Contact:
Re: Fuel Economy Options.
Currently the aerodynamics in-sim aren't completely simulated. Air resistance is shared among all trucks and is calculated by some arithmetic formula, not by model shape. After looking in-depth, all trucks share the same rolling resistance defined within every chassis. The aero covers and tires are just for aesthetics. On the bright side, a 6x2 chassis seems to help a lot with the fuel economy compared to the 6x4; however, it compromises acceleration slightly.
Response to your side note: It depends on the configuration of the truck. If you drive with a day cab, you will actually be lighter in weight compared to one with a sleeper; therefore, the truck will accelerate faster (better power-to-weight ratio).
Response to your side note: It depends on the configuration of the truck. If you drive with a day cab, you will actually be lighter in weight compared to one with a sleeper; therefore, the truck will accelerate faster (better power-to-weight ratio).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest