BDF Tandem Truck Pack v149.00 (11 November 23)
Forum rules
SCS as a company do not wish to have paid mods on this forum. While we understand that not all paid mods use the Intellectual Property of other companies/people, it is very hard to moderate what is and isn't acceptable when money is involved. There are also concerns that it could look unfavorable to potential work partners going forward if SCS allow mods that may potentially use unlicensed branding.
Posting in the Mods forum (ATS and ETS2) is restricted to sharing free-to-the-public mods and providing support for mods. For more details, please check the Forum Rules.
SCS as a company do not wish to have paid mods on this forum. While we understand that not all paid mods use the Intellectual Property of other companies/people, it is very hard to moderate what is and isn't acceptable when money is involved. There are also concerns that it could look unfavorable to potential work partners going forward if SCS allow mods that may potentially use unlicensed branding.
Posting in the Mods forum (ATS and ETS2) is restricted to sharing free-to-the-public mods and providing support for mods. For more details, please check the Forum Rules.
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
Confirmed issue, not sure but my best guess is the drawbar hitting something below the truck.
- Flemming V
- Global moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: 28 Nov 2012 10:41
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
It can only be the Automatic Couple boxes which is too low now. I will look at it as soon as possible.
Thanks for feedback.
tbar and TarsoMagno, is it also the MB 2014 you have the problem with?
Thanks for feedback.
tbar and TarsoMagno, is it also the MB 2014 you have the problem with?
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
I was driving an SCS Scania Streamline. I'm going to add some larger diameter tires and see if that helps.
---- Rockies Back. This time HE'S at the wheel. Look out stoopid hoomans.
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
I tested on the MB new actros 6x4 with coolliner painted and hauling a coolliner trailer 2 axles.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 24 Apr 2017 18:51
- Contact:
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
The random(?) damage also happens with DAF XF 105, chassis 6x4, with our without any trailer. Maybe some (invisible?) parts of the chassis are hitting the road?
- Flemming V
- Global moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: 28 Nov 2012 10:41
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
I am pretty sure that it is the collision boxes I moved last weekend.
I'll move them back again today.
I'll move them back again today.
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
Hi, old MB low and mid cab doesn't have tandem box dot and also bdf_stuff.
Higher cab is ok.
Higher cab is ok.
Last edited by Tarso on 25 Apr 2017 09:03, edited 1 time in total.
- Flemming V
- Global moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: 28 Nov 2012 10:41
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
Strange, as they use the exact same chassis as the high one, but I will look at this today as well.
Thanks for reporting.
Thanks for reporting.
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
I thought they used different chassis since last update due to "face" matching bug that you corrected.
- Flemming V
- Global moderator
- Posts: 9224
- Joined: 28 Nov 2012 10:41
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Re: BDF Tandem Truck Pack v78 (23-Apr-17)
I had to add another variant for Low and Mid cabin, but I use the same parts as attached to my variant for High cabin.
So the chassis and parts are the exact same, but instead of only linked to High variant, it is now linked to all low and mid Variants also.
So same parts, just another variant. But I am looking into it as we speak now.
EDIT: Fixed now, I had forgot I had used suitable_for[]: in all stuff for MB, so I had to add suitable_for[]: to new chassis variant as well.
So the chassis and parts are the exact same, but instead of only linked to High variant, it is now linked to all low and mid Variants also.
So same parts, just another variant. But I am looking into it as we speak now.
EDIT: Fixed now, I had forgot I had used suitable_for[]: in all stuff for MB, so I had to add suitable_for[]: to new chassis variant as well.