[ARCHIVED] SCS General Discussion Thread

User avatar
Tarso
Beta tester
Posts: 8243
Joined: 04 Apr 2016 11:03
Location: -5.865761, -35.216600
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9891 Post by Tarso » 17 Mar 2017 18:29

There will be a long road to reach ETS2 state, But of course everyone hopes for more variety of games in the truckin segment. So Aerosoft, bring it on!
User avatar
bumbumek
Posts: 2767
Joined: 02 Jun 2014 13:14
Location: Poznań, Poland

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9892 Post by bumbumek » 17 Mar 2017 18:58

SiSL wrote:[...] MAN TGX Euro 6 is there, why not here :D
Good question. What is wrong, that SCS cannot acquire license for MAN Euro 6? Maybe they should hire professional management for talks with company authorities?
User avatar
Tarso
Beta tester
Posts: 8243
Joined: 04 Apr 2016 11:03
Location: -5.865761, -35.216600
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9893 Post by Tarso » 17 Mar 2017 19:03

One thing i noticed is that MAN is giving licenses to games that only have MAN as manufacter inside.

I can list: Construction Simulator, Fernbus and now On the Road, maybe it's a temporary exclusivity contract in favor of MAN but also could be the reason MAN is not giving SCS the license, in the end it's only expeculation.
User avatar
Reef
Posts: 3903
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 23:16
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9894 Post by Reef » 17 Mar 2017 19:23

Seeing as MAN was the first official licence that SCS used (UKTS/GTS) it is rather surprising they are the only single truck represented in ETS2, perhaps they resent the fact that SCS has such an obvious hard-on for Scania? (or should that be Swift?)
User avatar
xXCARL1992Xx
Posts: 16462
Joined: 17 Aug 2016 12:18
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9895 Post by xXCARL1992Xx » 17 Mar 2017 19:55

would you decline if a Manufacturer comes to you and said "hey we want our Truck in your game and will even help and give you 2 Trucks to scan and dismantle" ?

why is SCS at fault that Scania has a more "favoritism" then other trucks if they throw the license in there direction without SCS even moving a finger to get it ?
| !!!NO SUPPORT OR REQUESTS OF ANY SORT VIA PM!!! | Screenshot Thread | Steam Workshop | World of Trucks Profil |
[ external image ]
User avatar
Tarso
Beta tester
Posts: 8243
Joined: 04 Apr 2016 11:03
Location: -5.865761, -35.216600
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9896 Post by Tarso » 17 Mar 2017 20:02

In my personal vision of this license thing, manufacturers should run to game companies and offer their licenses because it's almost free marketing for them compared to what games represent in today's world.
User avatar
Mohegan13
Global moderator
Posts: 19283
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 09:44
Location: West Yorkshire; Mars
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9897 Post by Mohegan13 » 17 Mar 2017 20:20

The problem isn't always the Manufacturers it's the lawyers who work on their behalf.

It's not the employees who play the game, or the Customer Service rep you need to convince. It's the overpaid suit who works for the top brass and has probably never played a video game in their life that you have to convince. :P

They have to take into account a lot of things, some companies lost sales because of how their products were portrayed in movies. Things as simple as "Oh the bad guy used that brand" can cost money. So giving licenses can be a bad thing for them. So when a small-ish company comes a knocking, particularly if the lawyer type thinks they are unproven, they can be turned away time and time again.

To us on the inside, it might feel weird to think a license might not want to be granted, but look at it as a point of view of the lawyer who has never heard of the game before and has to take into account brand image, and the safety of the brand.

Using MAN as an example; MAN seem to give their license for the old MAN to anyone and everyone. But so far I haven't seen anything of the new MAN anywhere. For all we know someone who used the license did something that MAN lawyers didn't like and they thought "never again".
[ external image ]
I reserve the right to be 100% wrong.
Something isn't right, nothing feels the same.
Everyone around me Is a different shade of grey.
JESAN
Posts: 382
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 18:36

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9898 Post by JESAN » 17 Mar 2017 20:28

Marketing and com are supposed to boost sales.
It's hard to measure how a sim game can impact trucks sales.
Maybe that's the point : no return on investment (those lawers' time and they're damn expensive :lol: )
User avatar
SiSL
SCS Software
Posts: 8663
Joined: 27 Oct 2013 06:23
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9899 Post by SiSL » 17 Mar 2017 20:34

I'm not even sure it is license side about MAN, SCS might just going for their schedule and it was not time for new TGX or lower priority...

It's practically face lift on model side in the end.
Last edited by SiSL on 17 Mar 2017 20:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mohegan13
Global moderator
Posts: 19283
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 09:44
Location: West Yorkshire; Mars
Contact:

Re: SCS Blog discussion

#9900 Post by Mohegan13 » 17 Mar 2017 20:40

Maybe they are thinking Scania R/Streamline here? Rather than waste time making a whole new model.

Make accessory options for the grill areas and just use variants to switch out the old and new MAN?
[ external image ]
I reserve the right to be 100% wrong.
Something isn't right, nothing feels the same.
Everyone around me Is a different shade of grey.
Locked

Return to “Offtopic and other voices”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests