SCS Software

Oh, I forgot engine braking positions are not as precise as retarder ones. I'll stick to the retarder workaround for auto transmissions but still, it's great for manual

@Skoot I'm not sure what you mean, I haven't removed anything, only changed some names.

@rookie_one Oh man Thanks for letting me know! Does it work properly with multiple step engine brake?

Vinnie Terranova wrote: ↑

02 Jul 2020 10:54

Has that happened before, three blogs in a row about the same DLC?

Happened with Washington

Washington: Seattle
Washington: Grand Coulee Dam
Washington Announcement

Inside core.scs, I extracted it with SXC Extractor.

Wacky Geek wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2020 11:45

Dear SCS Forum! Today I went to the toilet. Twice.

Honestly, that's a perfect impression

@Mohegan13 You're right, people always derail a bit from the topic and I don't mind when they do. I just don't like when someone turns the thread into a personal blog

And how is that related to SCS?

Blackspots wrote: ↑

23 Jun 2020 03:29

they even sound better than the old system

When it comes to engine sounds, on the exterior? Yes. In interior? Not even close.

You just showed him how to write an incorrect def line 12 times. The maximum output is not of 2600 nm, 2600 is the last rpm value in a series of lines that form the torque curve. What do you think that "torque:" line is for? You have 3500 nm between 1000 and 1400 rpm, hence the 1 next to those value...

No, I'm saying you completely messed up the torque curve. The first value is rpm, the second is percentage of torque value which is specified above rpm_idle.