Las Vegas thread

User avatar
Sora
Posts: 1530
Joined: 22 Feb 2017 18:47

Re: Las Vegas thread

#631 Post by Sora » 27 Jun 2020 01:19

I'm fine with them not adding any new roads, but they'd better at least fix the signage and signalling problems. Vegas can carry this update, but not in its current form.

User avatar
flight50
Posts: 14062
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Las Vegas thread

#632 Post by flight50 » 27 Jun 2020 01:30

I totally agree with Sora.

User avatar
Bedavd
Posts: 448
Joined: 31 May 2018 15:09
Location: Michigan

Re: Las Vegas thread

#633 Post by Bedavd » 27 Jun 2020 01:56

Yes. Every update I immediately fly over to see if Russell & Las Vegas intersection, and the Rancho Dr exit finally have stoplights added
Check out my Michigan research map!

Check out my ATS IRL map!
*Las Vegas has been mapped along with all other 1.38 roads, LA and SF are unmapped out of protest for their future rework*

User avatar
bobgrey1997
Posts: 3453
Joined: 30 Nov 2015 02:13
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Las Vegas thread

#634 Post by bobgrey1997 » 27 Jun 2020 03:16

Russel at Las Vegas Boulevard definately needs stoplights. Ranchero Drive does not, though. The only lane that is affected by the lack of a light is the westbound turn lane. As it is, they simply have to yield to oncoming traffic, which is very common.
ImageImage

User avatar
Bedavd
Posts: 448
Joined: 31 May 2018 15:09
Location: Michigan

Re: Las Vegas thread

#635 Post by Bedavd » 27 Jun 2020 13:50

I respectfully disagree. I think most, if not all SPUInterchanges are controlled by a signal, and the Rancho intersection in LV is in real life. They have SPUIs all over the map, so I don’t think it would be too much work for them to add the signals.
Check out my Michigan research map!

Check out my ATS IRL map!
*Las Vegas has been mapped along with all other 1.38 roads, LA and SF are unmapped out of protest for their future rework*

User avatar
supersobes
Global moderator
Posts: 9659
Joined: 07 Dec 2016 21:53
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Contact:

Re: Las Vegas thread

#636 Post by supersobes » 27 Jun 2020 17:07

I've never seen a single point interchange that isn't controlled by a signal either. SCS definitely should add signals to the one in Las Vegas. It can not be left without traffic control as it is right now.
Image
Scania trucks are the best, but the Peterbilts are good too.
Road signs are just as important as the road itself.

World of Trucks Profile | ATS Screenshots | ETS2 Screenshots | Forum Rules

User avatar
Sora
Posts: 1530
Joined: 22 Feb 2017 18:47

Re: Las Vegas thread

#637 Post by Sora » 27 Jun 2020 18:03

The big thing that bothers me is the lack of signage regarding I-515. Why is there no signage at a major junction with an Interstate? There should never be any doubt about what street you're crossing when you're going onto an Interstate. It doesn't even have any reassurance markers, as far as I can tell, and it should.

Even if you don't have assets for I-515 or I-11 ready in time for the update, signing it as US 93 and/or US 95 would still be better than nothing, which is what I see there right now.

User avatar
flight50
Posts: 14062
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Las Vegas thread

#638 Post by flight50 » 27 Jun 2020 18:10

Natvander is in charge of signage. I am completely confident in his abilities so I am not concerned about Vegas signage.....its beta and I truly believe the intent is for all feedback as signage is a polishing up thing.

User avatar
Sora
Posts: 1530
Joined: 22 Feb 2017 18:47

Re: Las Vegas thread

#639 Post by Sora » 27 Jun 2020 18:19

I'm confident in Nat's abilities, and appreciate what they've added to the rest of the map immensely.

But I don't remember a situation like this (where a large area was obviously totally unfinished) happening before, so I just want to make sure that SCS hasn't forgotten to ping him or something. I'm sure there's a good reason for things being the way that they are now, be it "the assets aren't ready yet", "LV was bumped up to 1.38 at the last moment", or even just "he's busy on Idaho", but I'm not taking any chances if there's a risk of this making it to the full release of 1.38.

User avatar
bobgrey1997
Posts: 3453
Joined: 30 Nov 2015 02:13
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Las Vegas thread

#640 Post by bobgrey1997 » 27 Jun 2020 18:32

Bedavd wrote:
27 Jun 2020 13:50
I respectfully disagree. I think most, if not all SPUInterchanges are controlled by a signal, and the Rancho intersection in LV is in real life. They have SPUIs all over the map, so I don’t think it would be too much work for them to add the signals.
I was thinking of a different intersection. Sorry about that.
I guess that just goes to show how badly the new Vegas need signage!
ImageImage

Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bumer, jeff_peters, Mic_2, Quark, TD781 and 15 guests