ATS concept map (fanmade)

Trucker Nik
Posts: 2141
Joined: 27 Feb 2021 10:29
Location: Trenčín, Slovensko

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1091 Post by Trucker Nik » 20 Jul 2021 05:28

Now there are 11 confirmed places for Wyoming, (based on the scs blog) if the city of Cody should also be 12 cities, on this map I see 11 places with Cody
User avatar
Bedavd
Posts: 1662
Joined: 31 May 2018 15:09
Location: Michigan -> Washington

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1092 Post by Bedavd » 20 Jul 2021 05:54

If you're thinking of Douglas, there's no confirmation that it'll be anything more than scenic. We just have a picture of a gas station and along I-25.
Check out my Michigan research map!
Check out my ATS IRL map! -> Leave any feedback in my thread!
Kansas added! Up-to-date blog photo locations for upcoming states also included.
Trucker Nik
Posts: 2141
Joined: 27 Feb 2021 10:29
Location: Trenčín, Slovensko

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1093 Post by Trucker Nik » 20 Jul 2021 17:12

@Bedavd https://truck-simulator.fandom.com/wiki/Wyoming i believe all these cities and scenarios that we will get
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30308
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1094 Post by flight50 » 20 Jul 2021 17:31

Douglas is not a worthy enough city to be marked. I'd be upset if it got marked over Cody. Not to mention, that Wiki is not official SCS. That is a fanmade site just like the map in this thread. Ads678 made this map even though it looks like SCS production...its his guess. Same thing that wiki is doing.....guessing. Douglas is scenic at best and the only reason its scenic is to get to WY-59.
User avatar
ads678
Posts: 493
Joined: 27 Nov 2018 15:56
Location: Eastern Europe

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1095 Post by ads678 » 20 Jul 2021 19:41

Douglas in the list of marked cities from Wiki is someone's joke. I'm surprised it's still there.
Bedavd wrote: 19 Jul 2021 18:46 Very happy to see ads678 came back and got rid of the swirling black hole in Yellowstone now that we have confirmation from the devs!
The last update was on July 3rd, before the screenshot of Yellowstone was shown. I'm glad that SCS didn't ignore us and decided to add YS to the game. Too bad it didn't work with Utah and Idaho which were released unfinished.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30308
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1096 Post by flight50 » 20 Jul 2021 20:23

Lol. Yeah I really hope attention comes to Utah and Idaho at some point. After Texas, manpower will be there. I'd be okay if we got 2 states still after Texas if a team went and added 1-2 roads per state. That speeds up time and the rebuild team won't have to do it.

So if we get Texas and Montana for 2022, some might go to Louisiana and Oklahoma after 2022. If Arkansas can be in play too, let those people spread out over the map for 1 year instead. Save Arkansas for after Louisiana and Oklahoma. With the extra people left over after Texas and Montana, each extra person can take a state. Spend a year on it and add the 1 or 2 most requested roads. If each person can do 1 road per 6 months, we'd get 6 roads for any of the 2-3 updates in 2023.

Oregon. OR-38 and US-26
Washington. US-2 and WA-155
Idaho. ID-28 and ID-21
Utah. UT-12,UT-24, UT-95
Arizona. AZ-260 and US-70
Colorado. US-24 and US-36
New Mexico. US-60 and US-180

That is 12 roads total for a year if only 6 people worked a year on them. Then jump to that 3rd dlc a year for 2024. By then, more people could be hired anyways.
Tristman
Posts: 1561
Joined: 17 Mar 2021 20:15
Location: Pizza Hut

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1097 Post by Tristman » 20 Jul 2021 20:56

Most of those roads seem like good ideas, although I'd take WA-20 instead of US-2 in Washington, I don't really see the point of ID-28 once Montana arrives (since it kinda runs parallel to US-93 between Challis and Arco), and I'd take a complete US-34 instead of US-36 in Colorado. Perhaps also US-70 over Ruidoso Downs in New Mexico to make the east more accessible (my preference over US-180).

For Idaho, maybe a nice idea would be to give the US-95 coming from Oregon a refresher and connect it with Nampa via the ID-55, or the US-26 coming from western Oregon.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30308
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1098 Post by flight50 » 20 Jul 2021 23:00

I should have clarified better. I typically always say WA-20/US-2 to Newport and then to Sandpoint. US-2 from Spokane doesn't look like it will fit with the Bushnell farm there. ID-28 is just another road that a lot of people just been asking for. Seems like a nice detour type route. I'd rather ID-3 but I'd be cool with ID-28.

US-34 staggers too much the further it goes East. US-36 is more East to West and easier for SCS to make. Not to mention it goes much further East iirc. I wouldn't mind US-34 connecting US-385 to I-76 though.
User avatar
Polarlicht
Posts: 3356
Joined: 21 Oct 2018 21:00
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1099 Post by Polarlicht » 22 Jul 2021 17:21

Loving the detail with the Whittier - Valdez ferry. Whittier should be marked, with industries. Anton Anderson road-rail tunnel has to be done as well.
User avatar
ads678
Posts: 493
Joined: 27 Nov 2018 15:56
Location: Eastern Europe

Re: ATS concept map (fanmade)

#1100 Post by ads678 » 30 Jul 2021 13:20

Whittier has a population of about 200, there is no sense to make it marked.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Drive Safely, Killer-Of-Night, Supernovae, Tristman and 12 guests