Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
-
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: 27 Feb 2021 10:29
- Location: Trenčín, Slovensko
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
I can't tell you why, but I'm annoyed, I'd like him in the game
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
Topock POE? maybe they can fit it in between Exit 1 "HMS" and Exit 48 "US-93/Kingman", someday?
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
Yeah it's feasible! And it's not just that, there are many examples of such inaccuracies!
- hangman005
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 02 May 2019 02:50
- Contact:
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
Having enjoyed the rebuilt area of CA so far for a couple of months, Having really enjoyed driving I-5 between Sacramento and Redding, many many times now. In fact for me, it's opened California a lot, while the quality is not there with the rest CA, it isn't avoid as much possible bad. To be fair the biggest thing against it was it just plan boring. That said personally I hope there is a priority to rework I-80, as has been mentioned around here, by myself included. It is probably the only road left in game I actively avoid, especially Reno to Elko... I usually drop down and run US-50 if I have anything that'd normally take I-80. But that's just me.
-
- Posts: 3292
- Joined: 05 Feb 2013 05:16
- Location: Minnesota
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
AZ-Kingman be nice to have truck stop and extend AZ-95 connect to I-40 and Lake Havasu City make it deliverable and add London Bridge. With I-40 to the west add some old fragments
of US-66 which is CA-66. US-89 and add ALT-89 Marble Canyon to connect to AZ-389.
of US-66 which is CA-66. US-89 and add ALT-89 Marble Canyon to connect to AZ-389.
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
After exploring Wyoming quite a bit (and being very impressed), I can't help but imagine how nice the I-80 could be if Elko and Winnemucca were on the level of Rock Springs and Rawlins. Here's hoping that that is what the future brings.
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
I can wait to see what they will do with the Donner Pass(summit) and with that entire area of I-80 passing through Sierra Nevada range.
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
The bad side on this rebuild is when you arrive to a non rebuilt area. It's like a shock.
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
Main reason I think fast tracking I-80 in Nevada should go ahead of anything South of I-80 in California. Both Cali and Nevada need the updates regardless. Wyoming's I-80 leaves a lot to be desired with the rest of I-80. There will be a quality gap from Utah/Wyoming to California once California's I-80 is updated. Might as well do all of I-80 before moving South in Cali.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: 12 May 2018 13:43
- Location: UK
Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread
Agreed @flight50 but I’d also add the US50 too into California. Seems logical as I believe the 50 is just under the 80. I have a feeling though they’ll finish all of California before moving onto Nevada then Arizona.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: GoodTwApple, hangman005 and 16 guests