howey wrote: ↑10 Sep 2021 01:40
Tristam-94 wrote: ↑09 Sep 2021 18:21
I think the “missing out on trucks because they are out of production” is a weak argument.
If SCS wants to model older trucks, there is nothing stopping them.
Other games have shown that you can obtain licenses for them regardless of age.
If SCS depends on whether a brand wants to have their truck in ATS, only the newest trucks stand a chance.
Why would Western Star for example want their 4900 in ATS over the much newer 5700 (especially if a new model is launched).
I think reworking the older trucks in ATS is a good suggestion, and would improve the game a lot. Fans will always want the more classic models next to the brand new OTR models, and having them in the same quality as the CAD modelled trucks seems only fair.
Why would that be a weak argument when that's is more then likely the factor. Just take the old Cascadia for example they made a model intending for the original launch of ATS in 2016 showcased it and all but due to issues the model never came and eventually were got the new current model instead. Now that the old model is discontinued and they have the 122SD currently in their line up as well do you think the old Cascadia will make it into the game in the short term most likely not.
Now the 4900 is a different story yes the model has been around for decades but the truck is still currently in production. Besides SCS also recently has been looking at the versatility of the truck and the 49X is an example of this. It's a OTR, HH & Vocational model and also the 4900 can be spec'd in those configurations as well while the 5700 can not but considering the 49X has the versatility the 4900 has already I think the 5700 will be the next model anyway.
Yes that is true but I tend to find that SCS and perhaps the Manufacturers are at some type of agreement that their current production models should be the priority before going into their older models and I can understand that the Manufacturers would be looking at this game as a marketing tool to some degree.
I'm taking this reply to the Freightliner Discussion thread, since it's not really relevant to Peterbilt anymore.
We can only speculate on what happened with the old Cascadia, but there are two things we know for sure:
- At one point SCS modelled the old Cascadia (before CAD models).
- Freightliner was the last licensed truck manufacturer to appear in ATS.
What I think happened, is that SCS didn't have the license in order to release the old Cascadia. By the time they did get the license, the model they made looked outdated compared to other trucks that had been released, and the new Cascadia had already been out for quite some time. I believe Freightliner may have wanted to feature the new Cascadia instead of the old one, and SCS probably also wanted this because they had to remodel the old Cascadia anyway. Besides, the average ATS player would probably prefer the new Cascadia over the old one (because they want to drive new trucks that are added to the game), even if the old one is more common on the road.
If SCS shows interest in doing older trucks at some point, I think the old Cascadia will be high on their priority list, seeing how a lot of people on the forums (and maybe on other social media as well?) want it.
As for Freightliner's second truck in the game, I think there isn't really any other choice than the 122SD. It's the only other highway truck they have, it tailors more to the traditional truck market than the modern truck market, it's more heavy duty than the Cascadia but also not too heavy duty, and for the second truck I don't think they would want to feature two generations of the same model anyway.
With Western Star, if we had the 5700 as the first truck (and the 49X hadn't been released yet), I think the 4900 would the obvious #2, but since we got the 49X I think the next truck will really be the 5700.
Hope you don't mind the long post in a different thread, I enjoy the discussion!