Wyoming Discussion Thread
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 08 Dec 2019 17:45
- Location: November, December
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
ARE THOSE BUFFALOS?!?!?!??! Yellowstone is coming, get your trucks ready!
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
Yes I totally agree Rockatansky6. Those mountains are gorgeous. So many great screenshots. I can't figure out which one I like the most. So far, the parts of Wyoming we have seen in blogs have all had great views of nature. This is the one landscaping blog I've been looking for. Either SCS is holding back or YS is not a part of the dlc. We are still weeks out but at this point, I have to put YS at a 50/50 chance for the dlc.
Wyoming is going to be one of the last states that we can get breathtaking scenes of mountains to this degree. Well outside of the California and Nevada rebuilds of course. But in regards to moving East, Montana will close out the mountains of the West.
Wyoming is going to be one of the last states that we can get breathtaking scenes of mountains to this degree. Well outside of the California and Nevada rebuilds of course. But in regards to moving East, Montana will close out the mountains of the West.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
- Marcello Julio
- Posts: 5731
- Joined: 12 Nov 2016 19:27
- Location: Ceará, Brazil
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
All screenshots are amazing Wyoming promises to be another iconic state in quality terms
ATS and ETS2 is Hella nice!
My threads:
ETS2:
West Balkans Expansion Discussion
New DAF arrived on Euro Truck Simulator 2
ATS:
The Dakotas (North and South) Discussion Thread
Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Volvo Trucks Discussion Thread
My threads:
ETS2:
West Balkans Expansion Discussion
New DAF arrived on Euro Truck Simulator 2
ATS:
The Dakotas (North and South) Discussion Thread
Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Volvo Trucks Discussion Thread
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
^Agreed. For a state that some would say is a flyover state, SCS sure is making a pretty good argument to say otherwise. On pic 1, I actually like SCS's mountains better than the real ones, lol. This is not the first time we have been able to say that with Wyoming. Wyoming is seriously a nature wonder though. Pic13 is just as awesome. They are doing a damn good job on the mountains. I am loving that rock formation tool. I can't wait to see all the non paid states get upgraded with this tool. I will miss them but we must push on to the Great Plains. The new map lead is handing his project very well. Kudos to Nemiro's brother. It makes a ton of sense if his team slides over to Montana after Wyoming is release. We need this beauty to carry over to the last beauty in the West. I am sure a couple might already be there if their assignments for Wyoming are done. If Oklahoma follows Texas, fine. Nothing we can do but Montana should seriously be next after Texas.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: 08 Dec 2019 17:45
- Location: November, December
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
I 100% agree with @flight50 . Wyoming could very well raise the bar after Colorado even though it's not well known. This team is really capturing the beauty of Wyoming.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
I think I've come to a conclusion on Pic 12. I think it's here. The layout of the roads seems to fit. I think the sign might be pointing to Sheridan and Lovell (of course this doesn't mean that US 14 Alt shows up, just that the intersection is there). This very blurry streetview I think fits well enough IMO.
We have the hotel looking building, (though the architecture is pretty different) and the farm in the background, plus the navigation sign fits the layout.
[ external image ]
[ external image ]
We have the hotel looking building, (though the architecture is pretty different) and the farm in the background, plus the navigation sign fits the layout.
[ external image ]
[ external image ]
Check out my Michigan research map!
Check out my ATS IRL map! -> Leave any feedback in my thread!
Kansas added! Up-to-date blog photo locations for upcoming states also included.
Check out my ATS IRL map! -> Leave any feedback in my thread!
Kansas added! Up-to-date blog photo locations for upcoming states also included.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
1st pic made me wow for the first second but then I realized that something wrong there.
First of all mountains are too small compared to a distance they are placed. Probably they moved it closer because of scale, but it's far unrealistic since year around snow top mountains are at least 3km+ height and in game they look like weird form hills.
Secondly it's snow itself. It seems like they used textures from early fall or late autumn for that mountains, because otherwise I don't understand how come there is a snow almost down to a foot of the mountains in the middle of summer. On the left side you can even see a heavy snow lying almost at the ground level.
Probably must fix location. I prefer realistic rather than scenic.
First of all mountains are too small compared to a distance they are placed. Probably they moved it closer because of scale, but it's far unrealistic since year around snow top mountains are at least 3km+ height and in game they look like weird form hills.
Secondly it's snow itself. It seems like they used textures from early fall or late autumn for that mountains, because otherwise I don't understand how come there is a snow almost down to a foot of the mountains in the middle of summer. On the left side you can even see a heavy snow lying almost at the ground level.
Probably must fix location. I prefer realistic rather than scenic.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
I feel like if we get Yellowstone it might be split between Wyoming and Montana. Wyoming part would first include the southeast junction of US-20 and US-191 just West of West Thumb/Yellowstone Lake. I just hope they don't do the mistake of leaving the part from Moran to Cody via US-191 and US-14 undone, that would be a big mistake in my opinion.
Then with Montana, we would see the northwest junction of US-20 and US-191 in West Yellowstone Montana, US-212 has a small chunk in Montana that we could get with WY SR-296/120 but that's for Montana I believe, no need to be too greedy.
This would be one of the odd times where we don't get the northwestern part of a state at release due to Wyoming being a bit more north than Idaho at this point, just north to that famous Zone of Death in Idaho. So it seems like once again Montana will come to save states both unlucky in shape and release order.
It's ok for me though if that small part is missing, it will be less worse than Salmon especially since it's unlikely to deliver goods to Yellowstone, I would love the numerous possibilities @flight50 mentioned time and time again. I-90 is also bound to suffer the same amputation as I-84 did, except this time with Texas, the reunion will be longer than 6 months.
I'm sure Yellowstone will have its dedicated blog, this one was for Nature, now wait for the other word starting with N.A.T. National Park.
Then with Montana, we would see the northwest junction of US-20 and US-191 in West Yellowstone Montana, US-212 has a small chunk in Montana that we could get with WY SR-296/120 but that's for Montana I believe, no need to be too greedy.
This would be one of the odd times where we don't get the northwestern part of a state at release due to Wyoming being a bit more north than Idaho at this point, just north to that famous Zone of Death in Idaho. So it seems like once again Montana will come to save states both unlucky in shape and release order.
It's ok for me though if that small part is missing, it will be less worse than Salmon especially since it's unlikely to deliver goods to Yellowstone, I would love the numerous possibilities @flight50 mentioned time and time again. I-90 is also bound to suffer the same amputation as I-84 did, except this time with Texas, the reunion will be longer than 6 months.
I'm sure Yellowstone will have its dedicated blog, this one was for Nature, now wait for the other word starting with N.A.T. National Park.
Stick to the route. Stop for nothing. Make the drop.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
@flight50 I do too think that 10/13 could very well be Hogback Interpretive Site.flight50 wrote: ↑14 May 2021 15:21 No confirmation for YS yet still. I think the blog is incorrect though. Its states the Tetons is the largest ecosystem in the lower 48....isn't that Yellowstone with that stat?
I'm not 100% positive but I think pic 10 is this in the Bighorn Mountains. This is that one view that I mentioned I saw the guy with the drone do several locations in the Bighorns. I think 11 and 12 might also be Bighorn Mtns.
It does look way better ingame than IRL. Atleast of the photos I have seen so far.
Saw blog -> googled Teton -> google maps -> Bighorn National Forest -> Big Horn Medicine Wheel -> continue google maps -> Hogback Interpretive Site -> maps again, who knew? -> SCS Forums -> maps again. -> oh right, post this post.
->edit this post:
I forgot to write. Bridger–Teton National Forest is big! Bigger than I thought.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.