Not on here at least. In due time they will speak on streams. No point in saying anything here because we have no clue what's going on. Dlc's releases between other dlc is mute when there is only one map to release. There is a pattern until there is no pattern. A dlc will come when its polished. Release a buggy dlc and we got Oregon 2018 all over again. That was perhaps the worse dlc launch that I can think of in terms of a released to soon not polished dlc. ATS can't afford another buggy Oregon. Bad enough we get some missing roads that the vast majority speculated to be in. Minus those and non polished and your asking for bugs.ThatWeirdTrucker wrote: ↑23 Jul 2021 21:09 I guess I worded my words wrong then, I only assumed it was a delay. I was not positive about the delay. SCS would never tell us anything like this honestly.
I disagree. It only takes a few days to move back into the office. Its not that difficult as it was moving out of the office. My office just moved back 2 Mondays ago full time. Granted we are not as large as SCS is but they could have incrementally came back. It was the busiest the first 3 days. 1 week is not enough to say it was a delay. Based on what most of us speculated, we are several weeks off. But that is only going by previous dlc releases in which we had 2 states per year. If Texas goes to 2022, Wyoming would be our only map. So if it pushes deeper into the year, no worries. It'll come eventually though.korpiklaani728 wrote: ↑24 Jul 2021 06:43 The release date of Dlc Wyoming is still being addressed here, but have you noticed the blog on SCS that only last week they returned to the offices from the Home office, hired and taught new employees and moved the offices to new premises ?? I think that too could be the reason for the later release of WY.
I have to disagree. Are you saying all of California won't be rebuilt unit after 2030? Assuming it will take til about 2030-2033 to complete the US? California can easily be a 2-3 year project with a small team. Actually sectors means a ton. Only one person can work a sector at a time. There are only so many sectors that will get done per update. I doubt CA will lack much when NY comes. CA is the same quality as Idaho/Colorado and Texas will be. Visually, not sure how much more then can or should try improving outside of AA support and weathering system. Its been noted that ATS is pretty much leveling out graphically at this point. There is no huge jump from 2019 map to 2020 maps. That could go several years before we see a jump. If anything, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington would lack quality. Not California. California will be newer than Wyoming and maybe even Texas by the time its completed. Wyoming is looking good but it won't be a night and day difference compared to Wyoming to Arizona let say.clifflandmark wrote: ↑24 Jul 2021 11:37 not everything in CA will get rebuilded until lower 48 completed. so definition of CA rebuild is something "smaller" than I expect.
2 sectors means nothing. I could write there 5-6 sectors or 10-15. this will not change what will get rebuilded.focus on what I mean instead of how words chosen.
You can't expect 3 people to rebuild whole CA. Can you guess how long it would take if 3 people rebuild whole CA. Unless rebuild team does not support with more manpower, either "rebuild" definition is smaller or a completed CA takes too long.
altough I want CA to rebuild as fast as possible, it'll lack of quality when NY comes.
