Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

User avatar
poozykrem
Posts: 978
Joined: 21 Sep 2019 22:00
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#261 Post by poozykrem » 03 Jun 2021 00:05

It looks cool ngl
User avatar
supersobes
Global moderator
Posts: 13714
Joined: 07 Dec 2016 21:53
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#262 Post by supersobes » 03 Jun 2021 01:57

In my opinion, the the 567 looks fine with the Ultraloft cab. It doesn't look all that different than the Western Star 49X does with the 72" sleeper cab.

[ external image ]
leo.arevalo12ss
Posts: 1232
Joined: 22 Aug 2020 01:32

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#263 Post by leo.arevalo12ss » 03 Jun 2021 02:12

parasaurolophus67 wrote: 02 Jun 2021 23:59 tbh, kinda looks like freighliner Cascadia and peterbilt 389 had a baby lol
I disagree more like the w990 and the 579 having a baby lol
Take it with a grain of salt nothing is 100% sure
User avatar
harishw8r
Posts: 4146
Joined: 14 Mar 2020 05:52
Location: Moon
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#264 Post by harishw8r » 03 Jun 2021 03:09

I’d say it’s weird being in the mid-way, but not too bad. Just a pair of vertical stacks and the look is complete.

So yeah it’s the baby of the 389 and the 579.
User avatar
murdoch82
Posts: 1398
Joined: 16 Jul 2013 11:52
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#265 Post by murdoch82 » 03 Jun 2021 03:39

I have said it for years, its a shame the 389 and W900 has not gotten more love over the years, the most iconic American trucks.
Only way to get a good 389 now is sketch payware I wont touch. I say that as I have bought many sketch payware planes for MSFS lol... To be fair, most of them are good, just they tend to release them in a poor state and then update it.

Anyway, I always found it so strange that none seem to care about these trucks. Especially on this forum... just like none care about the manual transmission... xD Heck, I dont even care about the manual transmission anymore, I like the auto's, especially these days, SCS has gotten them to a really good state and I'm sure it will get even better.

As far as I can tell the Pete 389 is the truck people aspire to own, imagine that is changing these days but traditionally that was the one to have. So I really hope we get these these trucks sorted properly some day. Personally, I enjoy any high quality truck, some engine options in some trucks still sound terrible and I'm one that actually like most of SCS sound now, but the Volvo VNL still sound pretty bad and weird. But I'm sure SCS will get that sorted, kinda hard to do now during the pandemic even if people are starting to get vaccinated. I have my first one and getting the second one in a few weeks.
PC: AMD Ryzen R9 5900X, 32 Gb 3200 Mhz,MSI X570S Tomahawk WifI MAX, 6750XT 12Gb, 2x LG 27GL650B-F 144 Hz 1 x ASUS 24" 60 hz 3x1080p, G29 + H-Shifter, TrackIR5
User avatar
harishw8r
Posts: 4146
Joined: 14 Mar 2020 05:52
Location: Moon
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#266 Post by harishw8r » 03 Jun 2021 03:54

If there’s one model in game which really deserves a full rework, it would be the 389, and it will be definitely worth it.

I hope they do some sort of textured updates at least, while releasing the Peterbilt tuning pack. Personally, the 389 is the only long hood truck I love. I like the mid sleeper variant. Now all I’m waiting for is a tuning pack with more paintable parts and much longer stacks.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30357
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#267 Post by flight50 » 03 Jun 2021 04:34

I’m team W900. Between the two Paccar trucks, most of us classic truck lovers would love to get ATS’s first tuning pack to these brands to get some love. There have been plenty of people talk about these two trucks though. Not much silence has gone on. Same with getting a shifter in trucks. I don’t do automatics but no point in complaining either. Not for this. I have my subjects I’ll push on and neither of these trucks nor tuning packs are it.
Grizzly
Posts: 941
Joined: 13 Feb 2018 08:19
Location: Land of Oz

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#268 Post by Grizzly » 03 Jun 2021 05:48

Yeah plenty of us want updated w900 and/or 389. I don't care too much about manual since we can drive as if they were manual anyway and I've got an Eaton stick next to me here if I want to look at something :lol:
pigbrother
Posts: 3315
Joined: 03 Jun 2016 07:36
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#269 Post by pigbrother » 03 Jun 2021 06:58

Yeah, I said this many times before, the 389 and the W900 are the last hooray of the classic era and deserve better (much better). Yeah, is a supplemental effort for two already existing models, but I think this should be considered. Most likely ETS2 players will whine, but tbh Scania R 2009 and DAF XF 105 (or Magnum or Actros MP3) would deserve the same treatment to make it fair with two legendary oldies per game.

Maybe one day... (sobs, yeah, sure)
Last edited by pigbrother on 03 Jun 2021 07:00, edited 1 time in total.
I have approximate knowledge of many things
User avatar
dkasper00
Posts: 2868
Joined: 07 Jan 2017 22:59
Location: NJ

Re: Peterbilt Trucks Discussion Thread

#270 Post by dkasper00 » 03 Jun 2021 06:59

I'm neither, Mack person here.

Would honestly be happy though for those who like the W900 and 389 when and/or if the 389 and W900 get refreshed.
In a world full of swift drivers, I'm an O/O.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: flight50, oldmanclippy, radmik, Truckcrasher68, VTXcnME and 34 guests