ATS 1.39 Discussion

Posts: 251
Joined: 15 Feb 2016 00:54
Location: Temporarily Displaced Texan

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1001 Post by Hell_Raiser » 03 Nov 2020 15:09

I really hope this means we will finally be getting the I-80/US-101 interchange. I think it is definitely a teaser for a SF rework, there is no way they would have posted a picture of SF labeled "work in progress" if they weren't reworking it. They don't like hyping people for things that aren't happening.

Posts: 22
Joined: 06 May 2020 02:21

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1002 Post by ASUSTechSupport » 03 Nov 2020 15:11

Also there have been game files for I 238 and I 880 for a while in the editor.

User avatar
Vinnie Terranova
Posts: 1621
Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1003 Post by Vinnie Terranova » 03 Nov 2020 15:36

parasaurolophus67 wrote:
03 Nov 2020 15:04
Thats in Boise, Idaho
so, it has nothing to do with the San Francisco rebuild then?

User avatar
Global moderator
Posts: 11750
Joined: 07 Dec 2016 21:53
Location: Northern Virginia, USA

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1004 Post by supersobes » 03 Nov 2020 15:37

SCS has used the Boise State stadium in the background of the intro to a lot of the place guessing clips, even some of the ETS2 ones.

interstate trav
Posts: 841
Joined: 23 May 2018 15:44
Location: California

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1005 Post by interstate trav » 03 Nov 2020 15:54

That’s really cool, the Basemap gets the rebuilds, I’m hoping Los Angeles is next.

I had a feeling hey are rebuilding it behind the scenes and doing more then they are telling us. There releasing all these great new states so they want to keep the Basemap up to par.

Posts: 419
Joined: 31 Mar 2019 10:12

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1006 Post by HRTrucking » 03 Nov 2020 16:02

I had noticed the work in progress thing a day ago on the SCS Facebook page. Thought then it was a way of teasing for the San Francisco rebuild. Hope they'll do, might put my headquarters back to where my ATS life started :lol: . I liked the way San Francisco was done, just not practical to get to :) .

Posts: 628
Joined: 03 Mar 2020 16:33
Location: Potato Country

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1007 Post by Skoot » 03 Nov 2020 16:09

I started in SF as well. I'd rather have the whole city torn down and rebuilt from a scratch though.

User avatar
Samus L. Jackson
Posts: 141
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 14:00

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1008 Post by Samus L. Jackson » 03 Nov 2020 16:57

My first thought least visually, San Fran was the city that needed it the least, as far as the base map goes. It actually kind of looks like a city, and it feels unique and memorable. But @HRTrucking brings up a good point...doesn't seem like a whole lot of work goes through San Fran or the west coast. Maybe this will make it more of a destination? That would be great, if they did more than just a visual facelift.

I think all the cities in Cali/Nevada/Arizona need a lot of work though, but that's probably asking too much. Just seems like most of the "cities" feel like villages where less than 1,000 people would live. Anyway, hey, I'll take any improvements we can get, no sense in complaining about a free upgrade!

User avatar
Posts: 44
Joined: 02 Dec 2018 16:40
Location: Estonia

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1009 Post by supermatic200 » 03 Nov 2020 16:59 ... 2848898053 this one had ''work in progress'' as well, but it's already in the game. It may just be a mistake lol. But I hope not.

User avatar
Posts: 118
Joined: 03 Jun 2018 12:09
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: ATS 1.39 Open Beta Discussion

#1010 Post by GabrielT » 03 Nov 2020 17:05

yeah I saw that too (work in progress from Italy DLC already)
Province of Ontario:
Province de Québec :

Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Grizzly, Mohegan13, phylip25 and 10 guests