[REL] PaZzMod (Legacy) V 1.4.07 | ATS 1.46
Forum rules
SCS as a company do not wish to have paid mods on this forum. While we understand that not all paid mods use the Intellectual Property of other companies/people, it is very hard to moderate what is and isn't acceptable when money is involved. There are also concerns that it could look unfavorable to potential work partners going forward if SCS allow mods that may potentially use unlicensed branding.
Posting in the Mods forum (ATS and ETS2) is restricted to sharing free-to-the-public mods and providing support for mods. For more details, please check the Forum Rules.
SCS as a company do not wish to have paid mods on this forum. While we understand that not all paid mods use the Intellectual Property of other companies/people, it is very hard to moderate what is and isn't acceptable when money is involved. There are also concerns that it could look unfavorable to potential work partners going forward if SCS allow mods that may potentially use unlicensed branding.
Posting in the Mods forum (ATS and ETS2) is restricted to sharing free-to-the-public mods and providing support for mods. For more details, please check the Forum Rules.
-
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: 22 Aug 2020 01:32
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
What changed in the new version of pazzmod?
Take it with a grain of salt nothing is 100% sure
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
@leo.arevalo12ss. Here is the response from PaZz_
He made a lot of fixes and gave it compatibility for version 1.40.x.
System : Republic of Gamers, Windows 11 64Bits, 21H2
Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700HQ CPU @2,80 GHz, 8 of 8 Cores 2801 MHz, CPU setting : @3,70 GHz
Memory : 32 Go, 4233 MHz
Graphic : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, GPU Memory : 6Go, 120 Hz, DirectX V.12
Processor : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700HQ CPU @2,80 GHz, 8 of 8 Cores 2801 MHz, CPU setting : @3,70 GHz
Memory : 32 Go, 4233 MHz
Graphic : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, GPU Memory : 6Go, 120 Hz, DirectX V.12
- Travismods
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: 05 Aug 2019 10:30
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
Is the rumor true that I heard, that this (Pazzmod), Sierra Nevada and Mexico maps will be consolidated into one single map mod when 1.40 is out of beta?
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
That's true, the official announcement can be found on Reforma Discord. Will do a proper announcement in this thread as well when ready.
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
Not sure how I feel about that. Would prefer for the mods to be separate. I mean that's great for people that use all of them but I don't. Some of those other map combinations i'm not really a big fan of and would prefer if they were separate as well
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
I am with cdawg9999. I have mixed feelings about that. I too would rather have separate map mods. I don’t want all those in my game. No worries though. No need to complain. I’ll just have to stick with ProMods and wait for SCS’s update for the reworked base map. I liked having SN and PaZz but I cannot do all the Mexico maps. All the Mexico maps could merge and it should have been left at that. I respectfully disagree with the decision made.
Well good luck to you guys with the merge, I can’t get behind what’s coming unfortunately.
Well good luck to you guys with the merge, I can’t get behind what’s coming unfortunately.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
Mmmh, can't say I'm happy about that decision, Pazz. You likely won't care, but not everybody likes Behemoth map replacements like that. Best of luck, and I hope we'll still get the 1.40 version without SN+Mex
- Vinnie Terranova
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24
- Location: Netherlands
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
I do like the combination of PaZzMod, SN and all the Mexican maps. It's easier for me to maintain the map combo loading order thread. Also, I do like the Mexican maps, as they contain a lot of detail, a very complex road network and a lovely immersion: I really get the feeling that I'm driving in Mexico.
Does this new combination also means that it will include Chihuahua? I know that it's ready when it's ready, but I have no idea how ready Chihuahua is.
Does this new combination also means that it will include Chihuahua? I know that it's ready when it's ready, but I have no idea how ready Chihuahua is.
- Ludo Diabolo
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: 28 Jan 2019 16:15
- Location: French, Calais
- Contact:
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
I agree with the opinion of my comrades above, I am not a fan of Mexican cards at all, I prefer to stay on small addons that have reworked states already made by SCS.
For me Pazz Mods and Sierra Nevada were perfectly suitable for me separately, I never take the maps of Mexico, often too complex to set up, and often it contains errors in my LOG that I do not like at all.
For me Pazz Mods and Sierra Nevada were perfectly suitable for me separately, I never take the maps of Mexico, often too complex to set up, and often it contains errors in my LOG that I do not like at all.
ETS2:promods + Middle-East Add-On + TGS / ATS:promods Canada
SORRY MY ENGLISH, I'M FRENCH.
SORRY MY ENGLISH, I'M FRENCH.
Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.
Hi Flight50, I am only replying to your post as I'm sure Pazz will do a better announcement for the rest too. I wonder if you will do the same once Promods adds extra Canadian states? Will you also request them to carve it up per state and decline a one mod with multiple area's in it?flight50 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021 04:37 I am with cdawg9999. I have mixed feelings about that. I too would rather have separate map mods. I don’t want all those in my game. No worries though. No need to complain. I’ll just have to stick with ProMods and wait for SCS’s update for the reworked base map. I liked having SN and PaZz but I cannot do all the Mexico maps. All the Mexico maps could merge and it should have been left at that. I respectfully disagree with the decision made.
Well good luck to you guys with the merge, I can’t get behind what’s coming unfortunately.
Having all these seperate mods creates incompatibility and every single mod needs to create corridors or fixes after each patch or update. I really don't understand how people can be against one map mod containing all the seperate maps together in 1 bundle from the same team. If you don't like some area's for being outside the USA, then just don't drive there ? We cant create map mods where we let every person decide which parts they like and dont like and release 10000 different versions.
In the end it is everyone's right do not use certain mods or maps, we can't force. We do this as a hobby and the more people enjoy our work the better of course. But if some don't that's fine as well.
For some of us mappers it's better to be able to work together in one big map mod, like Promods does, to ensure better quality. Having to disappoint certain players who received personalized map mods until now is a part of the risk we are willing to take I would say.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests