[REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

Forum rules
SCS as a company do not wish to have paid mods on this forum. While we understand that not all paid mods use the Intellectual Property of other companies/people, it is very hard to moderate what is and isn't acceptable when money is involved. There are also concerns that it could look unfavorable to potential work partners going forward if SCS allow mods that may potentially use unlicensed branding.
Posting in the Mods forum (ATS and ETS2) is restricted to sharing free-to-the-public mods and providing support for mods. For more details, please check chapters [4] and [5] of Forum Rules.
User avatar
TomDooley
Posts: 1683
Joined: 01 Feb 2016 09:42

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#631 Post by TomDooley » 20 Feb 2021 07:24

I was running the 1.39 without problems on 1.40 oB, but thanks anyway, Pazz. Now SCS hopefully (after gigabytes of betas and patches for them) is soon on the finishing lane so we can get a brand spankin' new Imperial Country Simulator. ;) :D Can't wait! :lol:

leo.arevalo12ss
Posts: 1019
Joined: 22 Aug 2020 01:32

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#632 Post by leo.arevalo12ss » 20 Feb 2021 21:33

What changed in the new version of pazzmod?
Take it with a grain of salt nothing is 100% sure

User avatar
Frenchman
Posts: 149
Joined: 23 Oct 2020 03:09

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#633 Post by Frenchman » 20 Feb 2021 21:48

@leo.arevalo12ss. Here is the response from PaZz_
PaZz_ wrote:
19 Feb 2021 17:58
Please note that this is experimental. I've fixed many issues and most importantly any severe ones, but there might be some flaws. Everything will be resolved in a new version, when the open beta finishes.
He made a lot of fixes and gave it compatibility for version 1.40.x.

User avatar
koolizz
Posts: 468
Joined: 05 Aug 2019 10:30

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#634 Post by koolizz » 22 Feb 2021 00:15

Is the rumor true that I heard, that this (Pazzmod), Sierra Nevada and Mexico maps will be consolidated into one single map mod when 1.40 is out of beta?

User avatar
PaZz_
Posts: 229
Joined: 25 Apr 2018 17:41
Location: Germany

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#635 Post by PaZz_ » 22 Feb 2021 03:20

That's true, the official announcement can be found on Reforma Discord. Will do a proper announcement in this thread as well when ready.

cdawg9999
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Apr 2016 21:25
Location: Brandon, Manitoba

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#636 Post by cdawg9999 » 22 Feb 2021 04:17

Not sure how I feel about that. Would prefer for the mods to be separate. I mean that's great for people that use all of them but I don't. Some of those other map combinations i'm not really a big fan of and would prefer if they were separate as well

User avatar
flight50
Posts: 18573
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#637 Post by flight50 » 22 Feb 2021 04:37

I am with cdawg9999. I have mixed feelings about that. I too would rather have separate map mods. I don’t want all those in my game. No worries though. No need to complain. I’ll just have to stick with ProMods and wait for SCS’s update for the reworked base map. I liked having SN and PaZz but I cannot do all the Mexico maps. All the Mexico maps could merge and it should have been left at that. I respectfully disagree with the decision made.

Well good luck to you guys with the merge, I can’t get behind what’s coming unfortunately.

User avatar
TomDooley
Posts: 1683
Joined: 01 Feb 2016 09:42

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#638 Post by TomDooley » 22 Feb 2021 07:30

Mmmh, can't say I'm happy about that decision, Pazz. You likely won't care, but not everybody likes Behemoth map replacements like that. Best of luck, and I hope we'll still get the 1.40 version without SN+Mex

User avatar
Vinnie Terranova
Posts: 1717
Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#639 Post by Vinnie Terranova » 22 Feb 2021 07:33

I do like the combination of PaZzMod, SN and all the Mexican maps. It's easier for me to maintain the map combo loading order thread. Also, I do like the Mexican maps, as they contain a lot of detail, a very complex road network and a lovely immersion: I really get the feeling that I'm driving in Mexico.

Does this new combination also means that it will include Chihuahua? I know that it's ready when it's ready, but I have no idea how ready Chihuahua is.

User avatar
LudoModding
Posts: 648
Joined: 28 Jan 2019 16:15
Location: France

Re: [REL][WIP] PaZzMod V 1.4.01 | Imperial County, East Riverside County, La Paz County, Yuma, Mexicali, San Luis R.C.

#640 Post by LudoModding » 22 Feb 2021 09:02

I agree with the opinion of my comrades above, I am not a fan of Mexican cards at all, I prefer to stay on small addons that have reworked states already made by SCS.

For me Pazz Mods and Sierra Nevada were perfectly suitable for me separately, I never take the maps of Mexico, often too complex to set up, and often it contains errors in my LOG that I do not like at all.
ETS2 : Promods + RusMap + parisRebuild

ATS : PazzMods + Sierra Nevada + Bellingham Heights

Skineur ATS/ETS2 : https://www.facebook.com/groups/atelierludoatsets2

SORRY MY ENGLISH, I'M FRENCH.

Post Reply

Return to “Maps”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests