Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
- pigbrother
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: 03 Jun 2016 07:36
- Location: Romania
- Contact:
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
As far as I know, Australia emission rules are similar to Euro 5, while the European 530 HP MX13 is an Euro 6 complaint engine. Might explain the difference.
I have approximate knowledge of many things
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Yeah, I figured as much.
The US emssions laws are not worse or better, but rather different. Focuses on different things. But all that matters little when the trucking industry has been using that loop hole for many years now, 10 - 12 years? maybe... to get around it and built probably millions of gliderkits. That seem to be more or less dying now unless something changes soon. They cant build more gliderkits at large scales anymore, you can still do it in your barn at home tho. But not for long.
But the way things are going in the US... who knows... not even sure the rules set a year or 3 ago, cant recall... still applies.. xD
The US emssions laws are not worse or better, but rather different. Focuses on different things. But all that matters little when the trucking industry has been using that loop hole for many years now, 10 - 12 years? maybe... to get around it and built probably millions of gliderkits. That seem to be more or less dying now unless something changes soon. They cant build more gliderkits at large scales anymore, you can still do it in your barn at home tho. But not for long.
But the way things are going in the US... who knows... not even sure the rules set a year or 3 ago, cant recall... still applies.. xD

PC: AMD Ryzen R5 3600X, 2x8 Hyperx Fury RGB 3200 Mhz, ASUS ROG Strix B450-F Gaming, Gigabyte 2060 Super, 2x LG 27GL650B-F 144 Hz 1 x ASUS 24" 60 hz 3x1080p, G29 H-Shifter
- Crocko From Oz
- Posts: 786
- Joined: 31 May 2016 16:00
- Location: NSW, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
The MX13 510, 530 and our 460 and 550 are all the same engine. Same internals, same injectors, same everything ... it's just the computer program (map) that is different.
Same as the Cummins X15 485 and 600. One can buy a Cummins 485 and then have the 600 'map' put into the computer and you have a 600hp X15.
Many operators down here option the X15 600 (or even the 580) and then after they have 'run them in' (usually around the 100,000km mark) will have the computer re-mapped to 610-620hp. What's more, Cummins Australia will still cover the engine under full warranty @ 620hp. Go over that however and you're on your own.
Same as the Cummins X15 485 and 600. One can buy a Cummins 485 and then have the 600 'map' put into the computer and you have a 600hp X15.
Many operators down here option the X15 600 (or even the 580) and then after they have 'run them in' (usually around the 100,000km mark) will have the computer re-mapped to 610-620hp. What's more, Cummins Australia will still cover the engine under full warranty @ 620hp. Go over that however and you're on your own.
Last edited by Crocko From Oz on 14 Apr 2020 13:33, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: 12 Dec 2018 11:37
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
European emissions regulations focus on the CO/CO2 emissions, while USA regulations focus on the NOx if I recall correctly.
As those gases are generated in different amounts depending on the working profile of the engine (more or less oxygen, compression, fuel, ignition temperature...); same base engines are tweaked to behave a little different in its working profile in different markets to lower the emissions more sensitive on there. That causes the rated HP of the truck to change too between those different working profiles.
Also, sometimes it's a matter of resilience. An engine could be tampered to give more HP but at the price of less durability under certain work scenarios. US, Europe and Australian markets are very different not only in regulations but also in the kind of roads and jobs the trucks will have to endure. Companies test that, apply their maths and decide the average HP they can squeeze of an engine that will work in the "average duty" on those markets while preserving the desired level of resilience.
Regards
As those gases are generated in different amounts depending on the working profile of the engine (more or less oxygen, compression, fuel, ignition temperature...); same base engines are tweaked to behave a little different in its working profile in different markets to lower the emissions more sensitive on there. That causes the rated HP of the truck to change too between those different working profiles.
Also, sometimes it's a matter of resilience. An engine could be tampered to give more HP but at the price of less durability under certain work scenarios. US, Europe and Australian markets are very different not only in regulations but also in the kind of roads and jobs the trucks will have to endure. Companies test that, apply their maths and decide the average HP they can squeeze of an engine that will work in the "average duty" on those markets while preserving the desired level of resilience.
Regards
- Crocko From Oz
- Posts: 786
- Joined: 31 May 2016 16:00
- Location: NSW, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
A lot of the new imports (Scania, DAF, Merc, etc.) are now Euro 6. The X15's are still e5 specs though. Not sure with the MX13's, as I'm sure KW Aust (Paccar) gets them from DAF.pigbrother wrote: ↑14 Apr 2020 12:47As far as I know, Australia emission rules are similar to Euro 5, while the European 530 HP MX13 is an Euro 6 complaint engine. Might explain the difference.
- AntonioMart
- Posts: 186
- Joined: 30 Apr 2018 02:17
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Mack was in the game from the start.
But only like AI model and had no name, everyone know it's Mack.



Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Yeah the front grille and the mud flap gives it away. I am glad Mack Trucks hasn't said anything. What if.......just what if branding comes along with the Anthem for the cement truck as well.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Texas Discussion
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Texas Discussion
- Marcello Julio
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: 12 Nov 2016 19:27
- Location: Ceará, Brazil
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Nobody has commented on this subject here in this thread, I'm impressed 
Well, Anthem is coming
Source: https://twitter.com/SCSsoftware/status/ ... 9276493824


Well, Anthem is coming

Source: https://twitter.com/SCSsoftware/status/ ... 9276493824

ATS and ETS2 is Hella nice!
My threads:
ETS2:
Iberia Discussion
2021 Map expasion Discussion
ATS:
ATS 1.40 Speculation Thread
Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Volvo Trucks Discussion Thread
My threads:
ETS2:
Iberia Discussion
2021 Map expasion Discussion
ATS:
ATS 1.40 Speculation Thread
Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Volvo Trucks Discussion Thread
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
Lol. Perhaps because we all been in the ATS teaser thread or the SCS discussion thread. But yeah, it does make the most since in here after all.
So anyone with me for it coming this week? Obviously if 1.37 doesn't go live, we won't get the Anthem. I am waiting for SCS to post a stream date. Otherwise, they will just post 1.37 ending and with it, comes the Anthem. 2 more brands to go in ATS.
So anyone with me for it coming this week? Obviously if 1.37 doesn't go live, we won't get the Anthem. I am waiting for SCS to post a stream date. Otherwise, they will just post 1.37 ending and with it, comes the Anthem. 2 more brands to go in ATS.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Texas Discussion
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Texas Discussion
Re: Mack Trucks Discussion Thread
I say there's a good chance it's this week.
DK's Screenshots(5-26-2019)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bedavd and 12 guests