Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
- SmokeyWolf
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: 08 Mar 2019 23:27
- Location: Indiana
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
I would actually heavy haul with the 4900 and general freight with the 5700 and 4900.
We need the Eatons as that is still available. Besides can't use the H shifter with the 12 speed.
We need the Eatons as that is still available. Besides can't use the H shifter with the 12 speed.
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
I don't care for the 4900 so I won't be driving it at all. That's why I'd still with my W900. Now once overfloater finishes his W900 mod, I will switch to that because of the higher quality than SCS. I'll just park my original W900 for when the mod doesn't work for whatever reasons. I'd like to keep my W900 in operation for sentimental reasons. 1) it is my original first and only purchased truck on my main profile and 2) I'd like to rack up as many miles as I can on her. 1,000,000 was the goal a few years ago but that will prove to be impossible fore me. I don't play that much anymore. I am knocking on 250k though. When the 5700 and the new Cascadia comes, that will put a dent in miles. But since I love heavy haul so much and I'd much rather it, the W900 will still get a lot of love from me.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
- SirVirgoTheMess
- Posts: 7904
- Joined: 13 Aug 2017 13:09
- Location: Quebec,CA
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
The new Cascadia can be a nice heavy hauler.I mean,it has the engine for it.The gearbox?I don't know.
Does the new Cascadia have some kind of HD gearbox?
Does the new Cascadia have some kind of HD gearbox?
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
You don't run heavy haul on light gauge OTR frame rails and 40# rears....lmao
1.39 combined engine pack now available
1.39 default SCS replacement engine pack now available
MS Flight Sim 2020 - Alpha test team
1.39 default SCS replacement engine pack now available
MS Flight Sim 2020 - Alpha test team
- SmokeyWolf
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: 08 Mar 2019 23:27
- Location: Indiana
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
@Robinicus is right about that. You can spec a Cascadia as a heavy hauler but not many do. That is were the 122SD comes in.
@Virgo91 any truck can be spec'd for whatever you need it for providing the manufacture agrees to it.
@Virgo91 any truck can be spec'd for whatever you need it for providing the manufacture agrees to it.
- supersobes
- Global moderator
- Posts: 13714
- Joined: 07 Dec 2016 21:53
- Location: Northern Virginia, USA
- Contact:
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
I can only image what trying to do heavy haul with frame rails that were not built for it would look like. I've seen how the frame rails bend and flex when a tow truck is picking up a loaded tractor trailer that rolled on its side.
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
Ah, didn't notice that. Didn't look past 450 hp one.Virgo91 wrote: ↑02 Aug 2020 19:44 There's 3 single torque(or whatever it's called) 410 hp DD13.
https://freightlinerads.azureedge.net/9 ... -04-03.pdf
BTW, Eaton labels its automateds as Endurant (designed as an automated) and Ultrashift (repurposed manuals), while genuine manuals go under Roadranger name and show up as RTLO-something in the game.
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
One of the issues with new trucks in ATS is that they are not made for all situations and people want to use them in that way. For the most part, all ATS trucks are OTR trucks. With the exception of Paccar's W900 and 389 of course. 85% or more of the time when you see a heavy haul on youtube, its typically a Paccar truck. There are some WS's sprinkled in but every time I look and pretty much all the reference pics I find and have posted in the links in my signature, Paccar dominants heavy haul.
With that said, I really hope to see a 122SD within the next 2-3 years. I will jump the gun and say we get the 5700 and the new Cascadia this year. If I guess wrong, oh well, its just a guess. Next year (2021)...new VNL and LT and if we lucky the 4900. The LT is half done so it should only take half the work. It could already be in the works. So for 2022, go for the 122SD/T880 and maybe the W990. After that, its whatever. All the most common up to date trucks would be on the road. If SCS wanted to shoot for a Classic, 2023 would be nice.
With that said, I really hope to see a 122SD within the next 2-3 years. I will jump the gun and say we get the 5700 and the new Cascadia this year. If I guess wrong, oh well, its just a guess. Next year (2021)...new VNL and LT and if we lucky the 4900. The LT is half done so it should only take half the work. It could already be in the works. So for 2022, go for the 122SD/T880 and maybe the W990. After that, its whatever. All the most common up to date trucks would be on the road. If SCS wanted to shoot for a Classic, 2023 would be nice.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
There are high chances we get them in game, we can be somewhat sure about that since we already have m-drive and i-shift in the game, and not just eaton gearboxes.
Btw, which of these engines is better?
DD13 505 hp / DD15 505 hp / DD16 500 hp
- SirVirgoTheMess
- Posts: 7904
- Joined: 13 Aug 2017 13:09
- Location: Quebec,CA
Re: Freightliner Trucks Discussion Thread
@harishw8r which is better for what,pulling?
DD13 : 505 hp @ 1625 rpm/1850 lb-ft @ 975 RPM
DD15 : 505 hp @ 1800 rpm/1650 lb-ft @ 1100 RPM
DD16 : 500 hp @ 1800 rpm/1850 lb-ft @ 1100 RPM
Personally,i would pick the DD13.Power at low revs,same torque as the DD16.And i think it will be the cheapest option of the 3 engines.
But anyway,you're the one to decide.Preferences are different for each person.
DD13 : 505 hp @ 1625 rpm/1850 lb-ft @ 975 RPM
DD15 : 505 hp @ 1800 rpm/1650 lb-ft @ 1100 RPM
DD16 : 500 hp @ 1800 rpm/1850 lb-ft @ 1100 RPM
Personally,i would pick the DD13.Power at low revs,same torque as the DD16.And i think it will be the cheapest option of the 3 engines.
But anyway,you're the one to decide.Preferences are different for each person.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BluesyTune, Einstein_1977 and 13 guests