Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

User avatar
SouthernMan
Posts: 885
Joined: 07 Jun 2021 19:38
Location: Pilgrim on Earth

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2591 Post by SouthernMan » 26 May 2022 13:59

fra_ba wrote: 26 May 2022 06:49
SouthernMan wrote: 25 May 2022 16:38 I-40 near Flagstaff. Just an edit I made. Mountains far away, a more open scenery and characterized by a desert.
Nice shot. Do you have a before/after image?
I appreciate that, bud. So actually this place was just an edition representing this place, it's not near Flagstaff on the map itself. I just did it to see how it would turn out.
Study will not always make you wise, sometimes it will simply make you more superb.
User avatar
SouthernMan
Posts: 885
Joined: 07 Jun 2021 19:38
Location: Pilgrim on Earth

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2592 Post by SouthernMan » 26 May 2022 14:03

Shiva wrote: 25 May 2022 22:39 Nice views.
How does it look when you get closer?
And pass them?
Asphalt looks a bit oddly worn.
When approaching the mountains, they will probably be big because these mountains are really far away on the map. As for the texture of the asphalt, it really is a little worn. This road texture is from a pack of "road textures" I made recently.
Study will not always make you wise, sometimes it will simply make you more superb.
interstate trav
Posts: 1180
Joined: 23 May 2018 15:44
Location: California

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2593 Post by interstate trav » 27 May 2022 17:32

I like how someone else mentioned bringing the 14 Freeway to current.
I’ve driven a bit of he new part and it’s really cool, and I’m glad they plan on extending the 50. Now keep asking about the 99 and having the 14 as a Freeway. Then we might get them.

So far I think there doing great and I’m excited for what’s next. Los Angeles will be my favorite as I’m from that area, and I hope they add Palm Springs.
User avatar
Calibuddy99
Posts: 327
Joined: 19 Mar 2022 19:38

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2594 Post by Calibuddy99 » 31 May 2022 09:40

I hope they extend 99 to Sacramento. They have got to extend it by the time Stockton Rework releases or else it most likely won't ever go to Sacramento in this game.
Nothing to say here anymore.
User avatar
TheAmir259
Posts: 283
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 12:51
Location: Malaysia
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2595 Post by TheAmir259 » 31 May 2022 12:35

yep we will see by Phase 3, as Stockton's most likely to be included in this as well. In addition, i believe there shouldn't be any more at-grade junctions on the CA-99 like how there currently still is in the game, and they should also know that we are not just anticipating for US-50, but also the CA-99 to at least reach Sacramento as well.
Two wrongs don't make a right, three lefts...do :D
Trakaplex
Posts: 833
Joined: 13 Jan 2021 23:24
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2596 Post by Trakaplex » 31 May 2022 17:33

The new road layout makes it impossible to add CA-99 from Yuba City to Chico... probably adding CA-70 to US 395.

and besides, the Sacramento Valley is mostly flat. I-80 between Vallejo is really squeezed (which is the unrealistic part of the map they might need to fix). They have Dunnigan but not Williams (via CA-20). Those are my complaints, but other than that they did good. When will US-50 via Placerville/S. Lake Tahoe come?
Rule 2.3 - GDPR Violation
User avatar
TheAmir259
Posts: 283
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 12:51
Location: Malaysia
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2597 Post by TheAmir259 » 01 Jun 2022 13:54

Trakaplex wrote: 31 May 2022 17:33 The new road layout makes it impossible to add CA-99 from Yuba City to Chico... probably adding CA-70 to US 395.
Phase 2 has already arrived, i don't expect them to add that in the future, if you were talking about a place to squeeze in the CA-99 junction with US-50, then it'd make sense. By now its really safe to say they've ignored the CA-99 north of Sacramento, so i don't see any point in talking about them being added anymore.
Two wrongs don't make a right, three lefts...do :D
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30154
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2598 Post by flight50 » 01 Jun 2022 16:50

Trakaplex wrote: 31 May 2022 17:33 The new road layout makes it impossible to add CA-99 from Yuba City to Chico... probably adding CA-70 to US 395.
Agreed but its possible to add Chico as marked at least. Yuba is out. Exit 630 South Ave has those truck stops that can get us to CA-99. Drive thru Chico and give us CA-32 to CA-44 that already exist. That removes a dead-end. This could come later as more devs come back.

This adds density and economy to Northern California.
humility925
Posts: 2
Joined: 23 May 2022 20:53

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#2599 Post by humility925 » 02 Jun 2022 05:23

Idk, I think some people want hurry up to get 48 states, it's been 6 year now at least since game come out, some want florida, new york or midwest to drive thought, this game hadn't those states yet.
Last edited by humility925 on 02 Jun 2022 05:28, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests