Wyoming Discussion Thread
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
scs software ats wyoming dlc Do not leave it blank like ets 2 spain dlc because 2-3 ways came to dlc
For example; wyoming(route-16,route-120,route-34,route-85) any of these should come as a road.
same roads are boring in wyoming dlc because scs software
For example; wyoming(route-16,route-120,route-34,route-85) any of these should come as a road.
same roads are boring in wyoming dlc because scs software
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
WY-120, between Cody and Thermopolis? yeah, that would be nice.
US-16, do you mean the section between Buffalo and Gillette?
WY-34, Bosier to I-25?
US-85? that is best to wait until one sees how Nevada and South Dakota looks.
US-16, do you mean the section between Buffalo and Gillette?
WY-34, Bosier to I-25?
US-85? that is best to wait until one sees how Nevada and South Dakota looks.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
Wyoming route us-16 , wyo-34 yes Shiva
- oldmanclippy
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
- Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
North-central Wyoming, I feel pretty good about it at the moment. Roads that I think could benefit it in the future are ones that would support Nebraska and South Dakota.
WY-387 from I-25 to WY-59
WY-450 from Black Thunder Coal Mine to US-16
US-16 from Moorcroft to Newcastle
US-18 from I-25 to Mule Creek Junction
US-85 from US-26 to Newcastle
US-26 from I-25 to US-85
For sure, we'll get US-26 and US-18. I think US-16 and US-85 are likely but not locks. WY-387 and WY-450 are less likely IMO.
WY-387 from I-25 to WY-59
WY-450 from Black Thunder Coal Mine to US-16
US-16 from Moorcroft to Newcastle
US-18 from I-25 to Mule Creek Junction
US-85 from US-26 to Newcastle
US-26 from I-25 to US-85
For sure, we'll get US-26 and US-18. I think US-16 and US-85 are likely but not locks. WY-387 and WY-450 are less likely IMO.
headquartered in Denver [ external image ] and Brussels [ external image ]
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | German Cities
prediction maps: Greece+Nordic Horizons | Nebraska+Arkansas+Missouri
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | German Cities
prediction maps: Greece+Nordic Horizons | Nebraska+Arkansas+Missouri
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
WY-34, no real place for the intersections nor interchanges needed for it. I do not see thins coming.
US-16, east part of that is in, Gillette. Buffalo part is not, same with Worland. I think that will be a no.
But if you would want a Sheridan US-14 to Gillette, then that could be plausible. Part of it is cosigned US-16. But it would be rather short. Possible tho.
US-16, east part of that is in, Gillette. Buffalo part is not, same with Worland. I think that will be a no.
But if you would want a Sheridan US-14 to Gillette, then that could be plausible. Part of it is cosigned US-16. But it would be rather short. Possible tho.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
Worland was slight off from making it, and I see no space issues. But I guess the addition of that segment of US-16 via Ten Sleep would make Buffalo a full drivable town? I think US-14 from Sheridan to Gillette could be one. Just cut off US-16 west.
Rule 2.3 - GDPR Violation
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
If Worland were included, I think there would be too little room between Thermopolis and Greybull to really enjoy the space.
Buffalo currently doesn't exist, it's just a façade of a town next to the interstate, so they would have to build that from scratch.
Buffalo currently doesn't exist, it's just a façade of a town next to the interstate, so they would have to build that from scratch.
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
I'm at peace with Wyoming now. Ask for an inch, some people want a mile. We got a very critical part in the game. I don't see the need to poke the bear just because. There needs to be mad support behind a road from the entire community and I just don't see that happening. US-85 is one I pitched along with Cody but at this point, it can wait. I do think it needs to come but its not time for it. That's a South Dakota road to bring the Black his into play along with US-16 and maybe even US-18. Nebraska comes first though and we should get US-20 and US-26. I'm with @oldmanclippy though. Anything additional that goes into Wyoming will be extension roads for South Dakota and Nebraska. No doubt Eastern Wyoming will get some play. No need to do it now though. We have a fairly boxed up map thanks to Davido. Wyoming is much denser that I would have every hoped for.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: Wyoming Discussion Thread
Wyoming has enough roads and all the needed cities, so now i'm fine with this DLC. Every new road I would consider as a bonus. Every other map DLC still has 1-2 missing roads, but Wyoming is ok now.
- Trucker_71
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: 09 Apr 2018 07:35
- Location: Abbotsford BC Canada
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: simon.endt and 8 guests