Texas Discussion Thread
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
Loop 375, that would have needed quite the space, to get in, especially if one wanted the mountain section.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
When it comes to industry, the entire loop is wasted space. Its spotty at best on where industry is around it. There are junctions with ATS worthy industry though. So if we got anything for TX-375, they'd be isolated and not connected. I honestly wouldn't bother with it. I'd focus on
I-10, US-54 and US-62. Do some surface streets and call it a day.
I-10, US-54 and US-62. Do some surface streets and call it a day.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
- oldmanclippy
- Posts: 5385
- Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
- Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
The mountain section is the only one that could have been feasible, but making the mountains wide enough to carry the road over them would have been tricky. Probably the right decision to not include it.
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | see profile for link to Germany cities and Switzerland rework maps
prediction maps: Greece | ATS 2024-2025 DLCs
research map: Upper Midwest (work in progress)
prediction maps: Greece | ATS 2024-2025 DLCs
research map: Upper Midwest (work in progress)
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
I have confirmed Clearview font.
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
Driving around the state, some areas still use FWHA, such as I-45 in Fairfield.
Rule 2.3 - GDPR Violation
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
True, those signs are likely 15-20 years old though. When they are replaced, I'm sure they will be in Clearview.
AKA “OKRoads”, USA road sign photographer and road scholar
-
- Posts: 2146
- Joined: 27 Feb 2021 10:29
- Location: Trenčín, Slovensko
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
I'm starting to think that Texas is the 1.47 release and this year we'll get 1.47 and then Texas, 1.46 could come by September (open beta I think) and I could be wrong
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
^1.45 open beta just released and not even public yet. Worse case it goes to August but solid chance this month. Bug thread isn't big at all. Then Montana releases. It would be pretty sudden to get 1.46 so close to Montana when SCS can just add onto 1.45. Cruising Montana could last 1 or 2 months and then another open beta? If we got another update, it would be a maintenance update. Small and no need for an open beta. That would be the only way Texas goes to 1.47 instead of 1.46 if its a 2022 map.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
Montana? I still think august.
Texas? I do agree with flight50.
Texas? I do agree with flight50.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
- Vinnie Terranova
- Posts: 5109
- Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Texas Discussion Thread
How long does an Open Beta last normally? Because:
(on the ATS 1.45 Open Beta blog)SCS wrote:Please note, this Beta branch has been released earlier than usual and is a work-in-progress build that contains known issues & bugs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tails and 14 guests