Utah Discussion Thread

[Trakaplex]

Yeah, the UT-12/24/95 suggestion has been tiring, I agree but just...

Honestly my suggestion is UT-14. That would really improve the connection of I-15 to US-89 without going up to I-70.

[Optional Features]

Yeah, fair enough.

[raskol]

friends utah should also get rework in the game
there is terrible arizona rock around red bluff on the ut-191 road, sediment rocks should be used, the rocks on the road at the entrance to utah glen canyon should be red sand above but bad red color palette below
around moab should be redrawn badly, they should be redrawn haphazardly with old rocks, it is beyond terrible, it should be renewed, moab should be redrawn in arizona, reworking should be done in utah
....

[Shiva]

seriousmods, do you mean https://www.google.com/maps/dir/37.7488 ... m2!4m1!3e0 ?
Only a dozen + times. + as rbsanford writes.
There are some trucking limits, but trucks can take that route.

UT-150? maybe a few times mentioned. Trucks can take it, it seems.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/41.2654 ... m2!4m1!3e0
Ingame? UT-150 in Evanston is there, I-80 Exit 5? not there, but the road under I-80 is ingame.
Connection north of Heber? that would be needed to put inside the town, as in a fictional connector. Space? possible. Looks? no clue.

Trakaplex UT-14?
Do you mean the road connection itself, or that it would look as that road, with scenery?
Connection could be made, but scenery?
UT-14 + UT-143, could have been a better option https://www.google.com/maps/dir/37.8223 ... 677361!3e0 . But I am not sure about that one either, even tho Glacier National Park is fantastically done. Good side is, both ends are ingame.
UT-14 in Cedar, is a bit north of UT-143 in Panguitch.

[Optional Features]

@Shiva Yeah, 150 would have to be worked in, but that is it.

[TitleMax]

These mountains are pathetic XD

[parasaurolophus67]

@TitleMax a couple years late on that topic actually .-. Just have to wait till they retouch the state.

[Marcello Julio]

Not necessarily a state rework. It only takes one person to rework these mountains, which takes a maximum of 2 days. It just depends on SCS to place one person.

[Optional Features]

Here's what @koolizz did a while back. Something like this would be a major improvement. Similar edits need to be done all over the map: the scaling of the map shouldn't turn mountain ranges into tiny hills.

[ external image ]

[flight50]

@TitleMax a couple years late on that topic actually .-. Just have to wait till they retouch the state.

Better late than never honestly. Its one more person that says what we already talked about 3 years ago Winter of 2019. The more new people, the more obvious this is besides those of us that have been complaining for 3 years and counting. We can only hope SCS touches up older paid dlc's. But of all the paid maps, SLC mountains East of I-80 are the worse since the rock formation tool debuted. Ironically, the tool was made with Utah. Some parts of Utah have great looking rock formations but SLC....smh. They are horrible. I'm usually pretty fair with judging ATS but there are some parts that I can't justify. These mountains should have been addressed a long time ago. The more new dlc come out with rock formations, the worse SLC looks.

There are plenty of misses with the Utah dlc that should in fact rework SLC, rework the Salt Flats, fill in along side I-15 and fill in Southern Utah.