Oklahoma Discussion Thread
- paytonsnewheart
- Posts: 231
- Joined: 28 Jul 2022 20:36
- Contact:
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Are there any hidden roads or sneak peeks of Oklahoma through the developer free cam in the open beta 1.46?
Last edited by paytonsnewheart on 20 Oct 2022 21:51, edited 1 time in total.
Heart Transplant Recipient
Make-A-Wish Kid
World Of Trucks Profile
Steam Profile
----------------------
Ohio Discussion Thread
Make-A-Wish Kid
World Of Trucks Profile
Steam Profile
----------------------
Ohio Discussion Thread
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 06 Aug 2022 00:53
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Texas with Oklahoma really compliment eachother in the game. Unlike Idaho or New Mexico, where many of the outward cities for a time really weren't accessed by many (I still don't think I've been to Clovis for instance, and anyone knows about how far out of the way Salmon was), Oklahoma because of Texas feels like many of the cities wouldn't be super out of the way.
Colorado to me was easily the best DLC in connecting other states together like it did to Utah and New Mexico. I feel Oklahoma would rival that somehow. In a good way.
Colorado to me was easily the best DLC in connecting other states together like it did to Utah and New Mexico. I feel Oklahoma would rival that somehow. In a good way.
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Way too soon for this... Maybe with 1.47 or 1.48 depending on how for they are now into OK.paytonsnewheart wrote: ↑04 Oct 2022 21:41 Are there any hidden roads or sneak peeks of Oklahoma through developer free cam in the open beta 1.46?
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
There is nothing to be seen south of Lamar, and any other area you might see something from will come with the Texas DLC, so it's really too early to look at this.paytonsnewheart wrote: ↑04 Oct 2022 21:41 Are there any hidden roads or sneak peeks of Oklahoma through developer free cam in the open beta 1.46?
- oldmanclippy
- Posts: 5547
- Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
- Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
- Contact:
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
I think Kansas will be even bigger along those lines. Oklahoma will only connect Colorado with Texas via US-385. Kansas will connect them via much more.Quasimoto7 wrote: ↑04 Oct 2022 21:46 Colorado to me was easily the best DLC in connecting other states together like it did to Utah and New Mexico. I feel Oklahoma would rival that somehow. In a good way.
headquartered in Denver [ external image ] and Brussels [ external image ]
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | German Cities
prediction maps: Greece+Nordic Horizons | Nebraska+Arkansas+Missouri
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | German Cities
prediction maps: Greece+Nordic Horizons | Nebraska+Arkansas+Missouri
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: 02 Jun 2020 02:24
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Agreed. Kansas will help Oklahoma feel less isolated in the map. Like, yeah there's the CO connection, but otherwise it'll feel a little like New Mexico did before Colorado, just with Texas being Arizona in this scenario.oldmanclippy wrote: ↑04 Oct 2022 23:07I think Kansas will be even bigger along those lines. Oklahoma will only connect Colorado with Texas via US-385. Kansas will connect them via much more.Quasimoto7 wrote: ↑04 Oct 2022 21:46 Colorado to me was easily the best DLC in connecting other states together like it did to Utah and New Mexico. I feel Oklahoma would rival that somehow. In a good way.
Of course, the gap between getting OK-KS is going to be significantly shorter than the NM-CO gap was.
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Much much shorter, lol. With Texas coming, that leaves 3 paid map teams and 1 rebuild team. I don't think SCS will go 2 paid map teams and 2 rebuild teams. SCS needs to keep their foot on the gas if they still plan on doing Canada and Mexico. We'll get back to 2 states a year if not 3. Oklahoma without a doubt should be our Summer 2023 dlc. Or one giant map as a bundle with OK+KS+NE. More ETS2 style could work too. For the most part, that is what Texas is. So I can't rule out larger maps vs multiple releases. To be, multiple map releases is more stressful on the devs. Easier to make single map deadline than to keep 3 of them in one year. Annnnnd still have to worry about ETS2, that's a lot of releases. Keep it simple. The ATS map is getting large enough that ATS might actually be okay with getting larger chunks of maps. Some people are for this, some are against.
I'm cool with one solo state and one bundle as well per year. Who knows if SCS is aiming at 5 map leads to really get the ball rolling. Pavel always says that it depends on our wallets. I'll do my part, that's for sure. I'm sure many of you will do the same.
I'm cool with one solo state and one bundle as well per year. Who knows if SCS is aiming at 5 map leads to really get the ball rolling. Pavel always says that it depends on our wallets. I'll do my part, that's for sure. I'm sure many of you will do the same.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Of course we have no idea if OK-KS-NE will be single bundle. But Pavel said the team moved onto the next few "states". Moreover, the 1.45 gas assets were of OK, KS, and NE. This is still a mystery we may not know for another month. Bundle would be more efficient, since we could get more I-70 and I-80.
It's honestly too early for hidden roads, especially when OK hasn't been added to Steam yet. If OK is standalone, June should work. I think one team could do LA/AR. Now I know the Texas map is technically finished now, with only a few looking for bugs. I am more on the side of larger maps, because if they charge $11.99 for a small state, it wouldn't be fair. Texas makes 3 teams, and Davido makes 4. 5 is pretty feasible. They could reach the Great Lakes by late 2025...
It's honestly too early for hidden roads, especially when OK hasn't been added to Steam yet. If OK is standalone, June should work. I think one team could do LA/AR. Now I know the Texas map is technically finished now, with only a few looking for bugs. I am more on the side of larger maps, because if they charge $11.99 for a small state, it wouldn't be fair. Texas makes 3 teams, and Davido makes 4. 5 is pretty feasible. They could reach the Great Lakes by late 2025...
Rule 2.3 - GDPR Violation
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
Texas only has 3 because they took pretty much all of Jakub's rebuild team and I'm sure some of Davido's team. Both Jakub and Davido should get some back once Texas releases if they haven't already. To get 5 teams, they must hire more people. It may or may not be too soon for that though.
My post are only thoughts and ideas. Don't assume it makes ATS.
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Poll: Choose Next 2 ATS States
ATS Flatbed
ATS Special Transport
North American Agriculture
Poll: Out of Production Truck
Re: Oklahoma Discussion Thread
I too feel that many states will be released together in the future...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DisgruntledTrucker, jontsuba, Seerman and 9 guests