SCS General Discussion Thread

Aziz · #29671 Post by **Aziz** » 30 May 2023 18:50

It's at best 1.1

Trucker Nik · #29672 Post by **Trucker Nik** » 30 May 2023 18:54

How many blogs are left for Oklahoma?

Vinnie Terranova · #29673 Post by **Vinnie Terranova** » 30 May 2023 18:59

If the northeast of Texas will get a few deliverable cities with some scenery towns and roads between, I would say: Texas 1.5

Eduard_Kenobi · #29674 Post by **Eduard_Kenobi** » 30 May 2023 19:12

I feel disturbance in the Force.

oldmanclippy · #29675 Post by **oldmanclippy** » 30 May 2023 19:22

Texas 1: Episode 1

Episode 3 might take a while...

CmonMakeThemSuffer · #29676 Post by **CmonMakeThemSuffer** » 30 May 2023 19:24

My photo studio captures screenshots quite nicely but the problem is that it came out as a really small picture, when I zoom in, it shows in pixels.

CarbonGTGaming · #29677 Post by **CarbonGTGaming** » 30 May 2023 19:43

Trucker Nik wrote: ↑30 May 2023 18:54 How many blogs are left for Oklahoma?

There’s only 6 blogs for Oklahoma to go

xXCARL1992Xx · #29678 Post by **xXCARL1992Xx** » 30 May 2023 19:45

oldmanclippy wrote: ↑30 May 2023 19:22 Texas 1: Episode 1

Episode 3 might take a while...

well, we didnt get Half Life 2 Episode 3 or Half Life 3 but we got a Half Life 1.5, which was quite good if i say so myself, they do everything to avoid the number 3 in any way

harishw8r · #29679 Post by **harishw8r** » 30 May 2023 19:53

If I recalled correctly, what they actually mentioned was “Oklahoma was internally considered as Texas 2.0” solely due to the sheer number of road connections to be made and also the parallel mapping timeline of the remaining bunch of roads.

flight50 · #29680 Post by **flight50** » 30 May 2023 20:56

CarbonGTGaming wrote: ↑30 May 2023 19:43
Trucker Nik wrote: ↑30 May 2023 18:54 How many blogs are left for Oklahoma?
There’s only 6 blogs for Oklahoma to go

The microsite can change at any point in time. Not to mention no gameplay blog or anything else that could popup. The microsite isn't exact accurate. Both Montana and Texas changed up.

harishw8r wrote: ↑30 May 2023 19:53 If I recalled correctly, what they actually mentioned was “Oklahoma was internally considered as Texas 2.0” solely due to the sheer number of road connections to be made and also the parallel mapping timeline of the remaining bunch of roads.

That's actually not correct. Texas 2.0 internally is called 2.0 for the extra roads that did not make the Texas dlc due to time running out basically. Texas 2.0 is all Texas, and isn't part of Oklahoma at all. Texas 2.0 is way to much work to add as part of the Oklahoma dlc. To much is in Texas's borders and Texas dlc's owners would be highly upset if they must buy Oklahoma to complete Texas.

SCS Software

SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Photo Studio issue

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Re: SCS General Discussion Thread

Who is online