Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

interstate trav
Posts: 1345
Joined: 23 May 2018 15:44
Location: California

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8941 Post by interstate trav » 14 Nov 2024 00:12

Flight Im thinking this will get some other additions. Even possibly Chico, Im thinking add a bit more down the line. I still feel the 10 East of the 15 needs some exits and I feel like mostly it’s looking good but it’s still got some fixes.
User avatar
TitleMax
Posts: 65
Joined: 02 Dec 2021 02:39
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8942 Post by TitleMax » 14 Nov 2024 22:08

Cool, there's a Terminator 2 reference in the LA River
Attachments
20241114155820_1.jpg
Just some random guy
Shiva
Posts: 5379
Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8943 Post by Shiva » 15 Nov 2024 03:15

Nice!
flight50 wrote: 13 Nov 2024 07:19 One thing I have learnt.......no area on the map is ever done.......ever, lol. The map is constantly getting updated and tweaked in some fashion. Zero chance I stop pitching for Chico. If they can just randomly include Clifton Az, I don't see why they can't add Chico. After 4-5 years of complaining about SLC, it finally got fixed. Same thing with Tonopah and Vegas's patch. These things came without warning. They just happened. OKC's I-44 finally came. All it takes is bandwidth and some one freed up.

So far imho, California is not representing Agriculture very well at all. Not on the level that it should. Chico would help get something North of I-80. Zero chance Yuba City fits as its too close to the Reforma style I-80 work done. Chico already has the exit in Corning @ South Ave. That runs into CA-99. Run that South to Chico and from Chico get CA-32 going East to and connect it up to CA-44 anyway they wish.
Chico route, we have talked about earier :)
https://www.google.se/maps/dir/39.90646 ... 558,9.54z/
Corning - Chico - Susanville, route.
Maybe there is space for it, maybe not?

An alternative route, would been https://www.google.se/maps/dir/39.75044 ... 22,10.17z/
Orland - Chico - Susanville
But that would mean razing the nice looking Corning and replacing with Orland.
But still, would there be space for this route?

Fun thing is, that Redding to Susanville, map editor map shows the route as CA-44, CA-89, CA-36. But ingame it goes CA-44, CA-36.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
ASUSTechSupport
Posts: 122
Joined: 06 May 2020 02:21
Location: Worcester, MA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8944 Post by ASUSTechSupport » 15 Nov 2024 18:14

@Shiva I think another approach could be to retain Corning and add Orland as well. Ca-32 between Orland and Chico allows an easier route for traffic from the south to access Chico more easily. That stretch of I-5 is relatively empty and they could move to current rest area between Corning and Road 8 further south to allow for the Orland exit.

[ external image ]
User avatar
Seerman
Posts: 1457
Joined: 31 Mar 2021 13:59
Location: Twin Peaks, WA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8945 Post by Seerman » 15 Nov 2024 18:27

Since the California rework is officially finished, I think we can remove the mention of it from the topic title.
> MY MODS IN WORKSHOP ARE HERE <
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Star 5700XE Rework | Kenworth K100E | Peterbilt 389 Rework
User avatar
MLH82
Posts: 471
Joined: 23 Jun 2020 14:59
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8946 Post by MLH82 » 15 Nov 2024 18:32

TitleMax wrote: 14 Nov 2024 22:08 Cool, there's a Terminator 2 reference in the LA River
Found a Thunder Road reference from Grease as well in the LA river basin.
-- Mod author: Real companies, gas station & billboards for ATS and ETS2 --
User avatar
JoeAlex23
Posts: 3356
Joined: 04 Dec 2016 03:24
Location: Dominican Republic
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8947 Post by JoeAlex23 » 15 Nov 2024 18:34

Seerman wrote: 15 Nov 2024 18:27 Since the California rework is officially finished, I think we can remove the mention of it from the topic title.
No, we should NOT do that, this topic is about the whole base map, which includes California, Nevada and Arizona, also, who said California is finished? There are still things that can be improved and they can be discussed on this thread.
User avatar
Sara
Posts: 794
Joined: 05 Nov 2021 17:59
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8948 Post by Sara » 15 Nov 2024 19:13

Seerman wrote: 15 Nov 2024 18:27 Since the California rework is officially finished
Is it really though?
I think we can remove the mention of it from the topic title.
Isn't California part of the base map? And there is still active discussion about already reworked area's of California, especially in the northern part of the state around Chico area.
Shiva
Posts: 5379
Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8949 Post by Shiva » 15 Nov 2024 21:16

@ASUSTechSupport If the rest area south of Corning would be removed, then your plan might work.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 32067
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#8950 Post by flight50 » 15 Nov 2024 21:26

I agree that California should remain. Zero reason to remove it. The map as a whole is never done. So in the future when California gets updates........do we make a solo California thread? That doesn't make sense. Might as well keep all the California talk here. Its been in place for years now so why bother such an established thread where 70% of this thread is talking about California so far.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pasztecior, sga0617, TruckerKid