DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

User avatar
ScaniaMANIveco
Posts: 387
Joined: 25 Dec 2024 08:16
Location: Lithuania

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#151 Post by ScaniaMANIveco » 11 May 2025 14:35

Tried the DAF XD (still retain that CF was a better name) and it was surprisingly enjoyable. At first I was sceptical, since it just seemed like a smaller, less powerful version of the XF/XG/XG+. But it won me over.
User avatar
Hetisen
Posts: 106
Joined: 04 May 2019 18:10
Location: Brazil

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#152 Post by Hetisen » 25 May 2025 02:48

Guys, is it just me or have they added another symbol to the DAF XG dashboard? Have the collision sensor sounds changed too? I'm talking about the 1.55
User avatar
harishw8r
Posts: 4783
Joined: 14 Mar 2020 05:52
Location: Moon
Contact:

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#153 Post by harishw8r » 25 May 2025 04:31

I remember something along those lines happening in 1.54.
User avatar
Crocko From Oz
Posts: 639
Joined: 31 May 2016 16:00
Location: NSW, Australia
Contact:

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#154 Post by Crocko From Oz » 04 Jun 2025 23:49

SirVirgoTheMess wrote: 08 Feb 2025 16:40 Exactly! The transmission makes a difference. It's not only about the engine
It's not the engine HP or the gearbox/final-drive ratio that makes a truck pull a load better … it's the torque that the engine produces, and to a lesser extent the HP rating.

Take the Cummins X15 here in Australia for example. Our Cummins X15 550hp is produced in two variants, a 550hp/1850 lb-ft and a 550 hp/2050 lb-ft. It's quite obvious the 2050 will pull a load better than the 1850 with the same HP rating.

We also have the X15 580 Efficiency Series which is 580 hp/2065 lb-ft, which is slightly above the standard X15 600/2050. Btw, a 'factory' ECU tune (computer remap) for the 600/2050 can increase that to 625/2250 and still be covered by the factory warranty.

One other thing to remember is the SCS "game engine" itself. The SCS engine def doesn't rely on HP whatsoever, it solely relies on its torque figure. A 300/2050 engine will perform exactly the same as a 600/2050 engine.
MSI MPG Z590 Gaming Plus - Intel i7-11700KF - MSI MEG CORELIQUID S280 AIO
MSI RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X 8GB - Samsung LC32G7xT
T-Force EXTREME RGB 32GB DDR4 @ 4000MHz - 5 x Samsung SSD - 9GB total
Thermaltake ToughPower 1050W - LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 X mid tower
User avatar
Bandit & The Snowman
Posts: 3865
Joined: 23 Oct 2014 15:55
Location: East Bound and Down
Contact:

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#155 Post by Bandit & The Snowman » 05 Jun 2025 00:49

Yet the transmission still plays a role, it's the combination of both engine torque and drivetrain ratios that defines the ability to pull. The torque figures you gave are what the engine outputs, that's multiplied by the gearbox and final-drive rations and that's the resulting torque which counts.
User avatar
Crocko From Oz
Posts: 639
Joined: 31 May 2016 16:00
Location: NSW, Australia
Contact:

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#156 Post by Crocko From Oz » 05 Jun 2025 01:47

That is true to an extent, but you need "match" the engines torque curve with your final drive (diff) ratio so that it's operating in its "sweet spot". If you lower the diff ratio too far, you will take the engine out of that "sweet spot", especially in today's computer controlled engines which are tuned for maximum efficiency (emissions) and fuel economy.

Just using Volvo Australia's Euro 6 D17 780 as an example, peak torque is produced in a very narrow 200 rpm rev range - 1000-1200 rpm with +600hp available from 1000 rpm to 1950 rpm, with the maximum 780 hp coming in at 1700 rpm. Ideally, at Australia's max 100km/h (for heavy vehicles) you would want your rig to cruise in that (or around) 1000-1200 rpm "window" for maximum efficiency (Volvo's "economy revs" is actually specified as between 900-1300 rpm).

Obviously, that all gets blown out the window when you get to our 140-150 tonne, quad (4 x trailer) road trains found in the mining areas in northern Western Australia where lower diff ratios (or reduction gears) most definitely rule the roost (they're also limited to only 90km/h as well).
MSI MPG Z590 Gaming Plus - Intel i7-11700KF - MSI MEG CORELIQUID S280 AIO
MSI RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X 8GB - Samsung LC32G7xT
T-Force EXTREME RGB 32GB DDR4 @ 4000MHz - 5 x Samsung SSD - 9GB total
Thermaltake ToughPower 1050W - LIAN LI LANCOOL 215 X mid tower
Winchester1979
Posts: 690
Joined: 30 May 2018 14:57

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#157 Post by Winchester1979 » 05 Jun 2025 10:22

Bandit & The Snowman wrote: 05 Jun 2025 00:49 Yet the transmission still plays a role, it's the combination of both engine torque and drivetrain ratios that defines the ability to pull. The torque figures you gave are what the engine outputs, that's multiplied by the gearbox and final-drive rations and that's the resulting torque which counts.
Don't forget wheel size.

Bigger wheels means a faster truck, but with less torque - which means you want a higher diff ratio to give the wheels more torque at the expense of speed. Similarly, smaller wheels means a slower truck, so you want a really low diff ratio to trade some of the torque for more speed.

If you're using mods like Galimim's Drivetrain Revisions and any of the realistic tire mods, you'll hopefully quickly notice that there are some obvious "sweet spots" where a particular combination of engine, gearbox and tire size will basically leave the truck running at idle at 70, 80 and 90 kph in the top three gears, for maximum fuel economy. Change any of the three, though, and you're going to be stuck with a truck that doesn't want to stay in the low end of the RPM range at any "normal" speed, because it wants to shift down to a lower gear constantly.

On the other hand, for some applications you want max pulling power, and running economically at a certain speed becomes a luxury. In that case, you're probably going to want standard-size tires (315/70), the strongest engine, and the gearbox with the highest available diff ratio. With the options available in Galimim's mods, the truck will still reach 80 kph at the top end, but won't like being there... but it will move with just about any load you can find in the game, and will work its way up any hill too.

(and in real life, or with a little bit of modding, you can have the *serious* heavy haul equipment, with diff ratios greater than 7, where the truck tops out at 60 kph but will pull 200 tons...)
User avatar
Borgrim
Posts: 1932
Joined: 04 Dec 2022 20:38
Location: Eindhoven, Holland

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#158 Post by Borgrim » 05 Jun 2025 17:11

User avatar
Borgrim
Posts: 1932
Joined: 04 Dec 2022 20:38
Location: Eindhoven, Holland

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#159 Post by Borgrim » 05 Jun 2025 17:19

User avatar
cydonianmystery
Posts: 313
Joined: 03 Jun 2022 02:42
Location: Louisiana, USA
Contact:

Re: DAF Trucks Discussion Thread

#160 Post by cydonianmystery » 06 Jun 2025 01:36

ScaniaMANIveco wrote: 11 May 2025 14:35 Tried the DAF XD (still retain that CF was a better name) and it was surprisingly enjoyable. At first I was sceptical, since it just seemed like a smaller, less powerful version of the XF/XG/XG+. But it won me over.
The XD is a genuinely solid truck and pleasant to drive. I've actually been surprised that it isn't more popular, especially since it can be configured for either on-highway or rugged applications. A very underrated truck.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rockatansky6, VonMacaroni