I didn't say it wouldn't be interested into know our wishes or that they don't listen forums users. What they listen from us are our trends and opinions; not our comments saying them how they should run their business (that's why all those "SCS should" in topic tittles are useless and misleading). And what I meant in my previous message is that no serious company with several million customers and tens of thousands of daily users on its games is going to decide anything based on a poll that got 700 votes in one year (approx).
Specially if we consider the fact that, as I told you and xXCARL1992Xx did too, SCS decided which DLC will come after Iberia way before the last reset of this poll. We have one map DLC per year but that doesn't mean that they require just one year to make a map DLC. They have shared lots of bits of info about all their internal process through the years and you can count that a map DLC should had been decided for sure over 2 years and probably around 3 years before its release.
So, in the hypothetical case that next DLC would be Balkans, have for sure that this will not be SCS deciding so as a kind of apologize or restoration over so many people hiper-frustrated after they hiper-hype we had pre-RttBS. Neither because the result of this poll (that it was GREATLY biased due that collective rant way back). If SCS releases West Balkans the next DLC after Iberia it will be because they already decided it way before people still to complain for weeks all over the forum as happened back in December 2019.
So, we can continue sharing our thoughts in here about whatever detail we could find reasonable; but we can't expect that anything we say in here or we vote would have any relevance; by the very basic facts that our messages here arrive late and because we don't represent the whole community.