Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

User avatar
Xaagon
Posts: 990
Joined: 07 May 2016 02:35
Location: Colorado Springs, CO, USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3981 Post by Xaagon » 26 Mar 2023 19:12

So far SCS has been pretty quiet about Nevada (unless I missed something). US-50 connecting Sacramento to Carson City is the first mention of it in the rework blogs that I can think of.

I can see the appeal of getting southern California up to today's standards as that's an area that many people are familiar with, or have a desire to travel to. Nevada also has appeal for the completion of I-80 as we've been talking about, but also for its desert environment. I remember when ATS first launched that a lot of the European players were especially enamored with the desert southwest as it's entirely different from areas that are a close drive away from their real life homes. This would probably apply to several US players that are on the east coast too.
MarkON
Posts: 787
Joined: 17 Sep 2018 05:54

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3982 Post by MarkON » 27 Mar 2023 14:52

A J K 91 wrote: 21 Mar 2023 18:26 Rest Stop in Avenal? It looks like it might even include Huron and Fresno. Phase 3 is going to be really huge. 😲
👀 Fresno
[ external image ] ;)
Last edited by MarkON on 27 Mar 2023 14:53, edited 1 time in total.
parasaurolophus67
Posts: 4583
Joined: 25 Sep 2018 12:32
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3983 Post by parasaurolophus67 » 27 Mar 2023 14:53

least we know Fresno is part of the phase.
MarkON
Posts: 787
Joined: 17 Sep 2018 05:54

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3984 Post by MarkON » 27 Mar 2023 15:00

Yeah, from what I've noticed, these QA numbers aren't listed in the player-reported bugs section, so it's likely the staff are already testing some areas.
User avatar
Rockatansky6
Posts: 477
Joined: 29 Oct 2018 22:41
Location: Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3985 Post by Rockatansky6 » 27 Mar 2023 15:37

But phase 3 would not come in this update. Or would you? It would be ambitious, but I think only in 1.48... :D
User avatar
Vinnie Terranova
Posts: 5111
Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24
Location: Netherlands

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3986 Post by Vinnie Terranova » 27 Mar 2023 15:41

parasaurolophus67 wrote: 27 Mar 2023 14:53least we know Fresno is part of the phase.
Not necessarely... With the Phase 2 rebuild, we can see the skyline of San Francisco on the horizon, but San Francisco itself is not part of Phase 2. The same could be said about Frenso where the plopping horizon is fixed; it doesn't have to mean that Fresno is part of Phase 3 (although I hope it is).
User avatar
harishw8r
Posts: 4105
Joined: 14 Mar 2020 05:52
Location: Moon
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3987 Post by harishw8r » 27 Mar 2023 15:43

I was quite confident about Fresno though. It would be a real surprise only if Bakersfield is included.
User avatar
Bandit & The Snowman
Posts: 3239
Joined: 23 Oct 2014 15:55
Location: East Bound and Down
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3988 Post by Bandit & The Snowman » 27 Mar 2023 16:11

All the changelog says is that something around Fresno is being built. It's probably internal only, definitely not part of the current beta, and there's always a chance that it will even have to wait until the phase after the next. We don't know their plans.
User avatar
Rockatansky6
Posts: 477
Joined: 29 Oct 2018 22:41
Location: Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3989 Post by Rockatansky6 » 27 Mar 2023 16:16

I find it strange to appear in the changelog, something that is not from this beta. But SCS always throws some mysteries at us. :D
User avatar
LATrucker
Posts: 513
Joined: 19 May 2018 17:01

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3990 Post by LATrucker » 27 Mar 2023 19:26

I don't think it was inteded to be in the public changelog... I think it was something from an internal build.
The rework is way to big and needs to be in the open beta from day one, because in an area with this size there'll be a lot of potential bugs and this will take some time to find them.

But this entries could mean that it'll be at least ready for 1.48 and that's great too :)
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alecwarper, dkasper00, Wrz1819887988 and 15 guests