Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

User avatar
Sara
Posts: 735
Joined: 05 Nov 2021 17:59
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3851 Post by Sara » 17 Mar 2023 16:53

flight50 wrote: 16 Mar 2023 23:49 Texas 2.0, California phase 3 and Oklahoma coming together for 1.48 would generate a lot of hype.
Oh, I think there will be no Hype Meter that will be able to cope with the hype level if that ever did happen. But it also all depends on what is coming for 1.48 too, and the time frame of 1.48 as well.

But outside of California revamp, Oklahoma and Texas 2.0, a graphic's update would be really nice too. Or at least DirectX 12 support anyways.
angrybirdseller
Posts: 3300
Joined: 05 Feb 2013 05:16
Location: Minnesota

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3852 Post by angrybirdseller » 17 Mar 2023 21:21

Arizona will be interesting rebuild one as Phoenix area have road art and decorations along I-10 and I-17, and US-60. Then along US-60 in northwest of Phoenix there large railroad depot, would remove AZ-303, but can get street level busyness of Phoenix.

Mesa should be added with rebuild as US-60 east of I-10 is east valley there plenty of industry could add like steel mill off Ironwood Dr, or home construction sites. AZ-87 another road to add to Payson and it connects to AZ-260 to Show Low.

Ehernberg replace with Parker and Quartzsite combo with AZ-95 as scenic Colorado River drive to I-40. We have platoon boats and large boats can make delivery spots along the Colorado River.

Yuma area should grow lemons, melons, cotton, alfalfa, grains, cotton, dates, and wheat, oranges. This overlaps into California with El Centro.

Camp Verde should be replaced with Prescott, but scaling works against it. This is where think spreading out places like Eddy Store to Rock Quarry spread these deliveries.

At moment California and Nevada are ones really need work. Think I-80 in Nevada first thing to rebuild after California is rebuilt.
interstate trav
Posts: 1199
Joined: 23 May 2018 15:44
Location: California

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3853 Post by interstate trav » 21 Mar 2023 00:54

Los Angeles should stretch from the Grapevine section on the 5 down to near Carlsbad adding Orange County Suburbs as scenic. Also along the 14 have Palmdale and Lancaster as scenic and maybe an exit. Then Mojave as well.
San Bernardino feels very important as it needs to be added, and the size of Los Angeles needs to feel very large. I’m thinking if there going to add the 205 near Stockton which is cool, then the 405 91 and even 110 if it can fit should be there. Also the 14 as the Antelope Valley Freeway needs to be added there. If they could fit the actual jct that would be impressive. It really is an interesting one.

Indio and Palm Springs need to be in there and I’d add the 62 as an alternate for the 10. Basically make it much more dense and downsize Barstow. Barstow is not very big at all.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30305
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3854 Post by flight50 » 21 Mar 2023 02:13

I-405 needs to fit if nothing else fits, lol. I'm sure more will but its the best chance we have to getting the ports and LAX. We should get the connection on the North side of I-5 in San Fernando and the South side of I-5 in Irvine. Those 2 extends should set up Los Angles North to South. The more they can squeeze in, the more we get. Then I-10 stretches LA East to hopefully San Bernadino can be marked as well. I-15 sets the tone of San Diego and San Bernadino. CA-1 will get reworked for a scenic coastline hopefully. Take more space from the water and get CA-1 pushed more into the Pacific. If they can massage those main roads enough, they could squeeze in some other critical routes. But start with I-5, I-10, I-15, CA-1 and I-405 for Southern Cali and find out what else squeeze's in.
Schinken235
Posts: 25
Joined: 30 Apr 2019 14:13

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3857 Post by Schinken235 » 21 Mar 2023 16:09

Finally some news on California! :D
Euro Truck Fan
Posts: 224
Joined: 11 Jul 2022 11:40
Location: (Moved to) Atlanta
Contact:

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3858 Post by Euro Truck Fan » 21 Mar 2023 16:10

Marcello Julio wrote: 21 Mar 2023 16:05 Oakdale will be replaced by Modesto.
R.I.P. Oakdale :(
I like to play ETS2 and ATS!
jarryed
Posts: 1555
Joined: 15 Mar 2018 12:08

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3859 Post by jarryed » 21 Mar 2023 16:20

Only reason I ever went to Oakdale was to search for a load going into Nevada to go across the Tioga Pass.

Modesto makes much more sense instead of a marked city with only one company.
You can never make a miserable person who complains about everything happy. They live by "If I can't be happy then no one can be happy."
ASUSTechSupport
Posts: 103
Joined: 06 May 2020 02:21
Location: Worcester, MA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#3860 Post by ASUSTechSupport » 21 Mar 2023 16:21

Pic 4- CA-99 Exit 226A in Modesto,CA - https://www.google.com/maps/@37.6392056 ... bfov%3D100

Pic 8- Ez trip Travel center in Avenal, CA - https://www.google.com/maps/@36.0763171 ... 384!8i8192
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andre_AW, Baidu [Spider], DoubleG01, Grizzly, Kaleidescoop and 14 guests