Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

User avatar
oldmanclippy
Posts: 9113
Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11521 Post by oldmanclippy » 09 Jun 2026 22:14

Battle Mountain sounds like a cut Halo 2 map name :P
TruckingWolfUSA
Posts: 1018
Joined: 26 Apr 2022 01:22

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11522 Post by TruckingWolfUSA » 09 Jun 2026 22:19

oldmanclippy wrote: 09 Jun 2026 22:14 Battle Mountain sounds like a cut Halo 2 map name :P
Actually I was wrong. According to Spooks map, it is already a milage target.
User avatar
oldmanclippy
Posts: 9113
Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11523 Post by oldmanclippy » 09 Jun 2026 22:21

Technically it's already in the game just not very realistic.

https://truckermudgeon.github.io/#11.20 ... 2/-117.193
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 35237
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11524 Post by flight50 » 10 Jun 2026 01:33

rbsanford wrote: 09 Jun 2026 21:06 I followed it up last night with San Francisco-Chicago along all of I-80 we currently have,
Bold man. I won't try it until I-80 is reworked. That's when I'll get caught up on dlc's I didn't buy post Louisiana. I remember how blank I-5 felt between Northern California and Southern California. The reworks made it 10x better for me. At 1:20 scale in mind, we got a lot more scenery. Scenic towns are more of a big thing now so I-5 became a really good visual route for me. I 100% expect I-80 Nevada to do the same exact thing......fill in where it should. Mke the map feel connected. Nevada is more barren but the updated scenery should make a HUGE difference.

Reno needs a massive update. Its so off. Winnemucca will get a nice rebuild to be more accurate. Elko I never paid attention to. Jackpot is what it is. It too will be better visually. Not sure if they'll touch NV-225. NV-140 to OR-140, I'm afraid if they redo that one, that they'll mess up the awesome elevation. It actually has a summit. That route reminds me of what White Bird Hill should feel like elevation wise. This route came when lots of complaints came about Southern Oregon was empty. So for 2018/2019 mapping, OR-140/NV-140 did great on elevation. If they touch that route, its imperative that they don't mess up the elevation for that route.
TruckingWolfUSA
Posts: 1018
Joined: 26 Apr 2022 01:22

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11525 Post by TruckingWolfUSA » 10 Jun 2026 01:51

Oh, one thing that they should definitely rework is CA-190 with Nevada, they never touched that in the CA reworks according to the map I looked at in the wiki. It looks pretty alright but I think it could be even better.
User avatar
rbsanford
Posts: 2628
Joined: 15 Sep 2018 02:11
Location: Duluth, MN

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11526 Post by rbsanford » 10 Jun 2026 02:36

The 140 is solid, except for some of the draw distance at Doherty Slide. The only adjustment it would need would be minor tweaks at its connection with US 95, but it would be neat to also get OR 205 between Denio Jct. and Burns as an alternate route.

The 190 could use some more up to date textures and improved draw distance. It's not too bad as it is, but if it's left alone, then it'll be behind both California and Nevada, which would feel awkward. With the way national parks have been represented since 2017, I'd love to see how Death Valley would be approached today; one thing in the area we need for sure, just for fun/PRT, is Badwater Basin, the lowest point of North America.
The Journeys of Zephyr of the American West
"Flyover Country" -- no
"Heartland" -- yes
Handy maps and diagrams.
User avatar
hangman005
Posts: 1311
Joined: 02 May 2019 02:50

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11527 Post by hangman005 » 11 Jun 2026 11:21

Maybe the snuck in, mapped out and are making a deliverable custom depot for Area 51..... it's about the only thing I can pretend make sense on why they're so secretive about the rework.
ATS HQ: Las Vegas, NV & Omaha, NE
ETS HQ: Trondheim, Norway
Promods Euro HQ: Reykjavik, Iceland
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 35237
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11528 Post by flight50 » 11 Jun 2026 15:47

They are secretive because its ATS. We don't get reworks info nor do we know much at all about how PRT will run. The total opposite for ETS2. We know all the reworks and we know how Coaches will operate. ATS isn't on the menu for details on the level of ETS2 imho. Maybe if ATS player base was more equal, perhaps there would be more drive to provide the same level of information. Until that happens, we'll probably stay in the dark.
interstate trav
Posts: 1469
Joined: 23 May 2018 15:44
Location: California

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11529 Post by interstate trav » 11 Jun 2026 20:25

My guess is we will get a short notice and Im thinking their doing Nevada all at once and we will get something like how they did the last part of California
TruckingWolfUSA
Posts: 1018
Joined: 26 Apr 2022 01:22

Re: Base Map Rebuild (CA, NV, AZ) General Discussion Thread

#11530 Post by TruckingWolfUSA » 11 Jun 2026 22:32

Yup, that’s my guess as well.

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Jelcz300, YandexBot [Bot]