I did a check for "Texas" mentions and there were surprisingly little. You were one of the few that sometimes mentioned it.SouthernMan wrote: ↑26 Jun 2022 14:24 Discussions may have strayed a bit, but it was always with the reference of "this could come in Texas DLC". But that's ok. Good job, mod.
If SCS used the resources they have already provided for themselves, we'd have about 35 cargo options for oilfield.danbywinby wrote: ↑26 Jun 2022 21:27 Another DLC similar to the Forestry cargo one but for something related to Texas would be amazing and would instantly make Texas better. But there's nothing to even hint at this so we can only dream and hope.
If SCS are indeed holding back the juicier details about the Texas DLC then obviously it's understandable because at the moment they want to push Montana because that's coming first so it does make sense. But they are actually damaging the hype for Texas by showing us all of the 'copy pastes' of the DLC so in order to overcome that they will have to show us some very juicy stuff before the DLC actually releases.
Yeah, there's a lot of standardization in the game. And without the ability to place our own buildings or buy land, we cannot edit it without becoming a mapper.SouthernMan wrote: ↑26 Jun 2022 22:54 One thing that also bothers me is that almost always the prefabs of these companies are square. I don't know, but I find it strange...
If they used some of the decorative companies, that would help greatly!SouthernMan wrote: ↑26 Jun 2022 23:10 @seriousmods Exactly! I believe this kind of standardization is a rule of SCS. It would be nice if in Texas we saw companies not so standardized.
Yeah, it won't: we'll be using the same old garages and warehouses from ETS 1 in New York lol.SouthernMan wrote: ↑26 Jun 2022 23:35 @seriousmods Agreed! But I think that will never happen, though. Sadly
Users browsing this forum: Brothergun, Mtrucker, Neoba, NonanteNeuf, Rockatansky6, SmalandAB and 33 guests