This is my desire as well.oldmanclippy wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 15:08 I want ATS to take what works from ETS2, combine it with what works in ATS, and add in all the types of company distributions that are missing from both games.
I posted a blue print. Its easy to comment off another person idea but I don't see anyone trying to break down what to do for ICC's. So any thoughts and comments are welcome. I can only get the ball rolling. SCS can see the conversations and come up with a solution that works keeping in mind info provided. My point is for the research team to use the list I provide as a guide as to what North America is about logistically. Find out what companies to bring now and for the future and what to implement in previous states. Find out how to make the economy deeper now. Find out how to make the economy deeper once you run out of industries to add. There is always a new company in the chain to bring into an existing industry.
So the regions I post, like I mentioned, it can be broken down to 5 regions or use the 7. I don't care. But my point is, don't treat ATS one big national map. For North America as a whole, there are many parts. For the US its national, regional and state specific company. Industries though are wide spread and they intertwine everywhere. But companies themselves can be everywhere. I am sure the same is for both Canada and Mexico. But then there is also intercontinental to deal with. These are your Walmarts, Home Depots, Coca Cola. The last one is your International/Global. This is also the same three and a few others I'm sure. You could even throw Ikea in that mix.
ATS just needs more variety/density and if it doesn't start with Texas, that would be a big mistake imo. Texas needs to be a game changer in thinking different for ICCs.