Texas Discussion Thread

Shiva
Posts: 4961
Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3901 Post by Shiva » 30 Jun 2022 11:12

Loop 375, that would have needed quite the space, to get in, especially if one wanted the mountain section.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30042
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3902 Post by flight50 » 30 Jun 2022 11:34

When it comes to industry, the entire loop is wasted space. Its spotty at best on where industry is around it. There are junctions with ATS worthy industry though. So if we got anything for TX-375, they'd be isolated and not connected. I honestly wouldn't bother with it. I'd focus on
I-10, US-54 and US-62. Do some surface streets and call it a day.
User avatar
oldmanclippy
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Jul 2020 02:23
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3903 Post by oldmanclippy » 30 Jun 2022 13:43

The mountain section is the only one that could have been feasible, but making the mountains wide enough to carry the road over them would have been tricky. Probably the right decision to not include it.
blog screenshot IRL maps: Greece | Nordic Horizons | see profile for link to Germany cities and Switzerland rework maps
prediction maps: Greece | ATS 2024-2025 DLCs
research map: Upper Midwest (work in progress)
Ryley03d
Posts: 162
Joined: 19 Jan 2022 23:51

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3904 Post by Ryley03d » 30 Jun 2022 21:13

I have confirmed Clearview font.
Trakaplex
Posts: 833
Joined: 13 Jan 2021 23:24
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3905 Post by Trakaplex » 04 Jul 2022 17:19

Driving around the state, some areas still use FWHA, such as I-45 in Fairfield.
Rule 2.3 - GDPR Violation
etsuco05
Posts: 81
Joined: 08 Jun 2020 17:54
Location: Norman, OK
Contact:

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3906 Post by etsuco05 » 04 Jul 2022 19:00

Trakaplex wrote: 04 Jul 2022 17:19 Driving around the state, some areas still use FWHA, such as I-45 in Fairfield.
True, those signs are likely 15-20 years old though. When they are replaced, I'm sure they will be in Clearview.
AKA “OKRoads”, USA road sign photographer and road scholar
Trucker Nik
Posts: 2146
Joined: 27 Feb 2021 10:29
Location: Trenčín, Slovensko

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3907 Post by Trucker Nik » 04 Jul 2022 20:36

I'm starting to think that Texas is the 1.47 release and this year we'll get 1.47 and then Texas, 1.46 could come by September (open beta I think) and I could be wrong
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30042
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3908 Post by flight50 » 04 Jul 2022 21:17

^1.45 open beta just released and not even public yet. Worse case it goes to August but solid chance this month. Bug thread isn't big at all. Then Montana releases. It would be pretty sudden to get 1.46 so close to Montana when SCS can just add onto 1.45. Cruising Montana could last 1 or 2 months and then another open beta? If we got another update, it would be a maintenance update. Small and no need for an open beta. That would be the only way Texas goes to 1.47 instead of 1.46 if its a 2022 map.
Shiva
Posts: 4961
Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3909 Post by Shiva » 04 Jul 2022 23:07

Montana? I still think august.
Texas? I do agree with flight50.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
User avatar
Vinnie Terranova
Posts: 5101
Joined: 09 Nov 2017 10:24
Location: Netherlands

Re: Texas Discussion Thread

#3910 Post by Vinnie Terranova » 05 Jul 2022 06:29

How long does an Open Beta last normally? Because:
SCS wrote:Please note, this Beta branch has been released earlier than usual and is a work-in-progress build that contains known issues & bugs.
(on the ATS 1.45 Open Beta blog)
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 17 guests