Montana Discussion Thread

User avatar
saur44l
Posts: 956
Joined: 07 May 2016 22:16
Location: Macedonia

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3752 Post by saur44l » 12 Aug 2022 20:31

Ok,whoever was working on the Glacier Park region deserves a raise or bonus,that part of ATS in on a different level in terms of map quality.That road there at this moment is by far the most beautiful road in both ATS and ETS2.
killingjoke28336
Posts: 517
Joined: 02 Sep 2019 12:50

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3753 Post by killingjoke28336 » 12 Aug 2022 22:04

SCS did a real good job with some of the places, very close to the real scenery.
[ external image ]
[ external image ]
User avatar
clifflandmark
Posts: 905
Joined: 13 Oct 2020 16:36
Location: Urfa
Contact:

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3754 Post by clifflandmark » 12 Aug 2022 22:41

Glacier NP is probably a new benchmark for game's quality both in terms of realism (elevation and route) and enjoyable driving experience (beautiful scenery). We wanted it, we got it. I really appreciate whoever mapped there and whoever mentioned Glacier NP support it's existence in ATS although it's not a trucking route. If you want to enjoy some day, go and check there.
User avatar
Marcello Julio
Posts: 5723
Joined: 12 Nov 2016 19:27
Location: Ceará, Brazil

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3755 Post by Marcello Julio » 12 Aug 2022 22:53

For me Montana brought the two best places: The Secret Road in Thompson Falls and the Glacier National Park.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30304
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3756 Post by flight50 » 13 Aug 2022 02:03

Shiva wrote: 12 Aug 2022 20:01
flight50 wrote: 12 Aug 2022 15:23 I rather him do the gap in Southern Utah and SLC mountain rework. US-2 to WA -20 is simple enough for another. The Going to the Sun mapper's talent is mountains.
Sorry to say this, but US-2/WA-20, is not simple.
Yes, simple if 1 does the basic road.
But if one wants scenery, that somewhat correspondens to reality? Then that is something else.
Southern Utah and SLC mountain rework? easier!
Simple enough as in much much shorter road. Complexity, I have no idea. I haven't looked into it but I know the Glacier guy is a great mapper that can handle Southern Utah solo. US-2 to WA-20 is 92.7 miles. In ATS that's probably 4-5 miles.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Colvill ... !3e0?hl=en


Southern Utah is quite mountainous which is perfect for the Glacier National Park mapper. That route is 283 miles . https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Shirt+T ... !3e0?hl=en

plus the Western connection for UT-24. That is 346 miles in total. That's close to like 17 ATS miles for Southern Utah.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Richfie ... !3e0?hl=en
Optional Features
Posts: 4750
Joined: 26 Sep 2019 20:14

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3757 Post by Optional Features » 13 Aug 2022 04:00

clifflandmark wrote: 12 Aug 2022 22:41 Glacier NP is probably a new benchmark for game's quality both in terms of realism (elevation and route) and enjoyable driving experience (beautiful scenery). We wanted it, we got it. I really appreciate whoever mapped there and whoever mentioned Glacier NP support it's existence in ATS although it's not a trucking route. If you want to enjoy some day, go and check there.
I haven't driven it yet, but in pictures looks like they had really proper mountain backdrops around.
Knightrider
Posts: 1458
Joined: 14 May 2018 07:25

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3758 Post by Knightrider » 13 Aug 2022 11:20

For those aiming for the 'power on' achievement, you need to deliver the poles/circuit breakers to the Faraday prefab to the south of Havre, not the north. Otherwise it will not count since the north prefab is just some warehouse prefab and not an eletric substation.
Best Regards.

Hosting a dedicated server for ETS 2/ATS, with optional mods support.
Shiva
Posts: 4993
Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3759 Post by Shiva » 13 Aug 2022 13:01

flight50, Complexity for WA-20/US-2, is high.

seriousmods SR-14 for WA? Would be nice for the sections that can be added. Even tho it would parallell I-84. https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.6959 ... 42!1m0!3e0
Maybe tricks used in GNP, would be useful for this road, if it ever gets added. + the road would look odd on the map, close to Portland.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Dirtyred01
Posts: 7
Joined: 06 Aug 2022 12:30

Re: Montana Discussion Thread

#3760 Post by Dirtyred01 » 13 Aug 2022 13:33

IonutL wrote: 10 Aug 2022 18:09
Dirtyred01 wrote: 10 Aug 2022 15:01 Can anyone tell me if steam and geforce now are syncing with montana yet?
I've contacted SCS support and their response was that the build should very soon be available on Geforce Now. How fast it goes depends on the Nvidia folks.
Thanks. Cause I had them refund my money cause it wasn't working.
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: majessky, marcel-dutch, MrD and 9 guests