Oh, you're right buddy.flight50 wrote: ↑04 Jul 2022 21:12 @SouthernMan The ones you posted are routes that gets signs. I think what SuchManor is saying that with overlays, these are roads we can actually drive on. So of the list SuchManor posted, the overlays is the one that I like seeing most. Its more confirmation as to what we can access. Of the one's SuchManor posted, MT-16 is the prize for me. But how much and where is the question. It would be great if all of it came.
Montana Discussion Thread
- SouthernMan
- Posts: 883
- Joined: 07 Jun 2021 19:38
- Location: Pilgrim on Earth
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
Study will not always make you wise, sometimes it will simply make you more superb.
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
- MT-135 I think we get in full, to get from I-90 to Thompson Falls
- MT-16 I think will lead from Glendive (our terminus on I-94) to Sidney (connecting with MT-200 terminus) to Culbertson (US-2 terminus), I expect it will be the most eastern road we get.
- MT-19 we might get in full, in favor of the part of US-191 from Lewistown north to where it meets MT-19.
- MT-194 I can't even find, no idea where that is.
- MT-200 I think is our main connector west-east for central Montana. Great Falls to Sidney we should get for certain as well as from Ravalli to Thompson Falls. I think there is a good chance we get MT-200 between Great Falls and Missoula to not make us drive a huge detour, but not sure.
- MT-200S I did not expect, might be our shortcut between Glendive and MT-200.
- MT-24 connects Glasgow with MT-200, we already know this road from the blogpost with the Fort Peck Spillway.
- MT-3 is co-signed with US-87 and MT-200 between Great Falls and Moore, otherwise it might be a stub in Billings, but I don't expect this road to connect.
- MT-47 is the shortcut between I-90 and I-94 preventing the detour over Billings, let's hope we get this one in full.
- MT-59 I also expect in full. We already know that we get it from Wyoming to Broadus, and it will probably continue to Miles City. After that I think it might connect to Jordan and the MT-200.
Overall I'd say the road network in Montana is looking good. Except for the potential US-20 miss, it doesn't look like we will have to do many unrealistic detours over other cities here.
- MT-16 I think will lead from Glendive (our terminus on I-94) to Sidney (connecting with MT-200 terminus) to Culbertson (US-2 terminus), I expect it will be the most eastern road we get.
- MT-19 we might get in full, in favor of the part of US-191 from Lewistown north to where it meets MT-19.
- MT-194 I can't even find, no idea where that is.
- MT-200 I think is our main connector west-east for central Montana. Great Falls to Sidney we should get for certain as well as from Ravalli to Thompson Falls. I think there is a good chance we get MT-200 between Great Falls and Missoula to not make us drive a huge detour, but not sure.
- MT-200S I did not expect, might be our shortcut between Glendive and MT-200.
- MT-24 connects Glasgow with MT-200, we already know this road from the blogpost with the Fort Peck Spillway.
- MT-3 is co-signed with US-87 and MT-200 between Great Falls and Moore, otherwise it might be a stub in Billings, but I don't expect this road to connect.
- MT-47 is the shortcut between I-90 and I-94 preventing the detour over Billings, let's hope we get this one in full.
- MT-59 I also expect in full. We already know that we get it from Wyoming to Broadus, and it will probably continue to Miles City. After that I think it might connect to Jordan and the MT-200.
Overall I'd say the road network in Montana is looking good. Except for the potential US-20 miss, it doesn't look like we will have to do many unrealistic detours over other cities here.
- Kaleidescoop
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 20 Oct 2018 06:46
- Contact:
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
Just noticed that that one AI vehicle (F-100?) that keeps popping up in prerelease media but never gets released has shown up once again in the Glacier National Park video on Twitter towards the end there.
[ external image ]
[ external image ]
I think trucks are cool.
- SouthernMan
- Posts: 883
- Joined: 07 Jun 2021 19:38
- Location: Pilgrim on Earth
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
Oh, very well noticed buddy!
I confess I hadn't noticed that. So you mean it's appeared in other pre-releases besides Montana stuff? Now, thats weird.
I confess I hadn't noticed that. So you mean it's appeared in other pre-releases besides Montana stuff? Now, thats weird.
Study will not always make you wise, sometimes it will simply make you more superb.
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
I think it only ever appeared in Texas material, but from very early on. So it’s probably coming with either Montana or Texas.
That new Mercedes SUV traffic car has already started appearing in the OB.
That new Mercedes SUV traffic car has already started appearing in the OB.
- Kaleidescoop
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 20 Oct 2018 06:46
- Contact:
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
It was in Wyoming blog posts as well
Image 19
https://blog.scssoft.com/2021/05/wyoming-nature-2.html
I think trucks are cool.
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
Yeah it’s been showing up since Wyoming screenshots, made it into plenty of Texas and Montana screens as well. I’d love to see it one day. Been over a year.
Check out my Michigan research map!
Check out my ATS IRL map! -> Leave any feedback in my thread!
Kansas added! Up-to-date blog photo locations for upcoming states also included.
Check out my ATS IRL map! -> Leave any feedback in my thread!
Kansas added! Up-to-date blog photo locations for upcoming states also included.
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
No MT-43? Another Salmon detour then, now in Montana. So (I guess) now we have 2 missing roads that should have been at the release (along with US-20).SuchManor wrote: ↑04 Jul 2022 20:30 To pair with that, here are the map overlay images which usually means that these roads will be drivable to some extent. This is most likely not all of the routes coming.
https://i.imgur.com/9cfqZkq.png
- Rockatansky6
- Posts: 484
- Joined: 29 Oct 2018 22:41
- Location: Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil
- Contact:
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
Quote removed - Don't quote images/code boxes - Rule 2.3
I've been waiting for this truck to show up from Wyoming. Why does SCS keep delaying her appearing in the game?
I've been waiting for this truck to show up from Wyoming. Why does SCS keep delaying her appearing in the game?
Re: Montana Discussion Thread
MT-16, there is MT-201 as a road sign and it only connects to MT-16 and MT-13.
At Le Havre, there is both MT-232 and MT-233. The latter is reachable via the first. So atleast 1 of those roads should be driveable for a bit.
Montana 194, what is that?! only thing I can find, is this https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.0291 ... m2!4m1!3e0
Does not make sense to me.
At Le Havre, there is both MT-232 and MT-233. The latter is reachable via the first. So atleast 1 of those roads should be driveable for a bit.
Montana 194, what is that?! only thing I can find, is this https://www.google.com/maps/dir/45.0291 ... m2!4m1!3e0
Does not make sense to me.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: automaton, flight50, gandalf7472000 and 8 guests