To be fair, just about all of the 8x4s SCs included are hot garbage. Which is weird. Placing an additional axle realistically shouldn't be hard, but yet they managed to mess it up.flight50 wrote: ↑21 Jun 2022 16:38 It takes the community to provide feedback and developers willing to implement that feedback. It happens a tad more often than SCS is given credit for. I'll give 2 more examples. Both I talked about for awhile. 8x4/4x2. They not perfectbut they are implemented. The other, ICC's. Most of you see me post about ICC's a lot. Has SCS not responded with what....8 new companies for Montana. We haven't seen new like this since 2018 brought Oregon.
Texas is bringing some new companies too. Phase 2 California brought one. So things not tagged to licenses or equipment/machinery seems easier to get in the game. So there is change. Just not the change some want. If SCS keeps their foot on the gas for ICC's, the game gets much needed diversity.
And then out comes the 9900, their best classic truck by far, and it doesn't get an 8x4 option at all.
@koolizz is right, though. When it comes down to it, we are paying for the same thing in new wrapping most of the time. I'd be surprised, shocked even, if Montana and Texas don't contain garages whose models date back to ETS1. And there are likely warehouses in these DLCs that are equally as ancient.
SCS will build a much better truck yard, and then block it off with XXX barriers or gates. Then they'll reuse the same old models for the functional part of the map, and call it complete.
It makes no sense.