ATS 1.45 Discussion

[SuchManor]

Apparently gas totem and price assets with "ks" and "ne" prefixes were also added. Combined with the "ok" assets, these seem to suggest the first bundled DLC (Oklahoma-Kansas-Nebraska) may be coming after Texas.

This is true. ks and ne are also there.

[Marcello Julio]

https://i.imgur.com/j550O9O.png

BESTCOMMUNITYEVER! They listen guys! They brought us...1 road! A bit of map, 1 new trailer and a couple of uninteresting tiny gimmick features. Now lets get back to...driving for half an hour and then back to waiting for more maps to drive.

Tell me really, why does it bother you so much? It sounds like you take it as an insult.

[Travismods]

@Marcello Julio Let the hype and speculation begin, only for us to be underwhelmed when SCS don't deliver, as is tradition.

[Travismods]

Because its truly funny when people claim for years of no new content or features that "SCS do listen, just you wait" and then they bring 1 new...road on the same old map and people are quickly stating "yep, they do listen!" when its just the same old map crap being churned out on the same old engine. We are still waiting since 7 years for features. The fact that they listened to 1 road request does not enhance the diversity of the gameplay in any shape or form. We already know SCS makes more maps, its about all they do. This isnt interesting and shouldnt make you think they truly listen at all. But I get it, bestcommunityever!

[parasaurolophus67]

Hey btw new al vehicle here https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/i ... 920/03.jpg

and another new company here? Beside the dark red trailer https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/i ... 920/02.jpg

[dkasper00]

I have 1 tiny gripe with the fuel tankers. IRL, they are not permitted at all in the Eisenhower tunnel, they have to bypass it. In my initial run run today, it showed the route to go right through the Eisenhower Tunnel.

[flight50]

Yessssss, that is the gas tanker I was hoping for. See the devs listen. Ohhh yeah. I've posted that type of trailer a few times. I think that's what TruckeDog hinted at.

That's not a new trailer, that's a new cargo for the container chassis

Hmmm. Not sure if its suppose to be container trailer though. Well they'd partially implemented it then.

We got this

[ external image ]
[ external image ]

Which is a compromise for this which are the ones I posted. I'm cool with what we got though.

[ external image ]
[ external image ]
[ external image ]

[Optional Features]

@Marcello Julio I can't speak for @koolizz, but what I will say is SCS is consistently doing things in a way that doesn't make sense.

This is the second patch we've gotten for convoy for example, and we still cannot share trailers, garages, buy a truck for each other, dispatch each other loads, or earn money as one collective company. We still don't have server support, and we will never get passenger mode. These all would be very exciting features that would make convoy a ton of fun: instead, we have basically a multiplayer version of the existing game with almost nothing new.

[parasaurolophus67]

Also a question, whats the difference on the Silo trailers and the cement trailer we have in-game rn? They are both kinda the same but one is shiny

[Marcello Julio]

@Marcello Julio I can't speak for @koolizz, but what I will say is SCS is consistently doing things in a way that doesn't make sense.

This is the second patch we've gotten for convoy for example, and we still cannot share trailers, garages, buy a truck for each other, dispatch each other loads, or earn money as one collective company. We still don't have server support, and we will never get passenger mode. These all would be very exciting features that would make convoy a ton of fun: instead, we have basically a multiplayer version of the existing game with almost nothing new.

These questions you approached will be addressed in the other Multiplayer mode that will involve World of Trucks.