ATS 1.45 Discussion

User avatar
Calibuddy99
Posts: 322
Joined: 19 Mar 2022 19:38

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1001 Post by Calibuddy99 » 06 Aug 2022 16:57

1000 posts on this topic
And yes, I get it the engine can't do everything
Nothing to say here anymore.
Optional Features
Posts: 4750
Joined: 26 Sep 2019 20:14

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1002 Post by Optional Features » 06 Aug 2022 20:48

@VTXcnME Yeah, it probably is harder than it seems for sure.
User avatar
flight50
Posts: 30304
Joined: 20 May 2017 03:33
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, Tx - USA

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1003 Post by flight50 » 07 Aug 2022 04:05

I mentioned in the Montana thread the other day but it seems like traffic got a little heavier with this last patch update or 2. I don't alter the game files and I don't run traffic mods anymore. Seems like a 10 to 15% increase to me though. Could just be me.
User avatar
Holzauge
Posts: 1184
Joined: 28 Aug 2016 13:33
Location: Republica de las Patatas

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1004 Post by Holzauge » 07 Aug 2022 10:04

Two things that bother me nearly from the beginning - and still exist.

First the way too short yellow phase at many (most?) traffic lights. Surprisingly in Montana I haven't encountered a traffic light with too short yellow phase yet! Maybe there are improvements on the way for the rest of the game (s) (ETS2 as well)! :)

Second the - in my opinion - way too short time between ringing of the bell/the warning light flashing at a railroad crossing and the moment the invisible barrier is there. There often isn't even time to react let alone bringing the truck to a standstill. Today in Montana northeast of Kalispell I was heading west. The tracks were crossing diagonally. The bells started ringing and before I could hit the brakes the truck crashed into the invisible barrier. Speed was 20 mph max (it was short behind a traffic light). Similar happened to me in other states. Very rare of course, but if you are too close to the crossing there is often no chance avoiding a crash! Highly unrealistic in my opinion. This shouldn't be a reaction test mini game! :D
VDMA
User avatar
Holzauge
Posts: 1184
Joined: 28 Aug 2016 13:33
Location: Republica de las Patatas

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1005 Post by Holzauge » 07 Aug 2022 10:26

If someone hasn't noticed yet: The Aero II hub cover is available as a painted and a chrome version, too! I don't know since when, just saw it at a repair shop. Anyway, thanks for that! I have been waiting very long for this! :D
VDMA
User avatar
_Roger_
Posts: 295
Joined: 24 Jul 2020 23:03

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1006 Post by _Roger_ » 07 Aug 2022 10:41

Some time ago, an update changed how T junctions were portrayed on the map. When the game first came out, they were T's. After one of the old updates, they were no longer straight T's, they now appeared as a sort of Y on the map, like these:
[ external image ]

This was my pet peeve with the game for years. I simply hated those junctions, but weather it was this update or not, I finally noticed they have been replaced with proper straight T's.

[ external image ]

Also, have they changed the weigh station pull in frequency? While driving through Montana I noticed I was bypassing a very high number of stations, and after reviewing the map, I appeared to only get pulled into 3 of 11 weigh station opportunities, 2 of which were in separate directions at the westmost one on I-90 in Montana.
Tristman
Posts: 1560
Joined: 17 Mar 2021 20:15
Location: Pizza Hut

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1007 Post by Tristman » 07 Aug 2022 10:44

Not sure how the pull in frequency works, and whether it's entirely random. In my experience, the heavier the load I'm pulling is, the more often they want me to weigh. :)
I'm not sure if it's actually based on weight though.
User avatar
_Roger_
Posts: 295
Joined: 24 Jul 2020 23:03

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1008 Post by _Roger_ » 07 Aug 2022 10:59

The way it used to work was simply a flat 60% chance of being pulled in (way too high and unchangable through text file or console editing for some stupid reason) which is why 3 of 11 is abnormal, should of been 6 or 7 times.
User avatar
-MLP-
Posts: 470
Joined: 31 May 2022 11:12

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1009 Post by -MLP- » 07 Aug 2022 11:07

/def/world/trigger_action.sii

trigger_action : trig_action.weigh
{
name: "Weight request (default)"

command: "weigh_req"

num_params[]: 0.6
}

change that to 0.0 or whatever you like and make it a mod.
User avatar
VTXcnME
Posts: 1288
Joined: 04 Jun 2021 12:53

Re: ATS 1.45 Discussion

#1010 Post by VTXcnME » 07 Aug 2022 13:05

_Roger_ wrote: 07 Aug 2022 10:41 Also, have they changed the weigh station pull in frequency? While driving through Montana I noticed I was bypassing a very high number of stations, and after reviewing the map, I appeared to only get pulled into 3 of 11 weigh station opportunities, 2 of which were in separate directions at the westmost one on I-90 in Montana.
Must have been luck of the draw. Driving Montana I don't think I've been cleared to pass one of them yet. (appx 7,500miles driven in state)
Post Reply

Return to “General discussion about the game”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: antonio512, jho9203, Obmir, oldmanclippy, Schinken235 and 17 guests