Dear SCS team,
Thank you for building such a strong community. As someone who’s mostly blind, I really appreciate being able to enjoy truck sim through your games and the tools you provide — including this forum.
I wanted to ask if there are any plans to update or modernize the forum system. I’ve noticed that the site runs on phpBB, and while it’s served well, performance has been slow lately, and it’s starting to feel outdated. From what I can tell, phpBB’s last major update was in 2020.
If you already have plans in motion, that’s great! If not, I just wanted to raise the concern early before it becomes harder to manage. Platforms like Discourse or Flarum could offer faster performance, better mobile UX, and a more future-proof home for this community.
Thanks again for all your work — I love being part of what you’ve built.
Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
-
christygruber1247
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 19 Dec 2024 03:00
-
plykkegaard
- Posts: 8880
- Joined: 26 Oct 2014 13:42
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
Latest 3.3.15 build is from Apr 2025
I assume one of the issues is a huge amount of data, not easy to port
Personally I don't like discourse never had
Maybe because I grew up with usenet and the nntp protocal
Unforeseen Consequences
- pigbrother
- Posts: 3609
- Joined: 03 Jun 2016 07:36
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
As a former admin and mod for a few forums… the dumbest mistake a forum admin can make is to put the content on someone else’s platform.
I have approximate knowledge of many things
-
automaton
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 02 Apr 2019 00:03
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
The SCS Modding Wiki, which runs on MediaWiki, is slow as well. I don't think the recent sluggishness is related to phpBB being dated.
-
Shiva
- Posts: 6187
- Joined: 21 Dec 2018 16:16
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
Well, it seems this forum and MediaWiki, are both based in the area of Nurnberg?
My guess would be the forum host has those 502 problems.
My guess would be the forum host has those 502 problems.
NTM's B-Double Telescopic Skeletal Container Carrier. Youtube video on how it works. W & S thread.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
B-Double trailer and short modes: EN 7.82 swap body, 20’ or 30’ containers.
Standalone 40' mode: EN 7.82 swap body, 20', 30', 40' or 2 x 20' trailer.
-
plykkegaard
- Posts: 8880
- Joined: 26 Oct 2014 13:42
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
when NGINX reports 502 error it is caused by the host behind is unresponsive
Not phpbb as such but just maybe the HW is not up to the task
Not phpbb as such but just maybe the HW is not up to the task
Unforeseen Consequences
-
Some newbie driver
- Posts: 7396
- Joined: 12 Dec 2018 11:37
Re: Question about the Forums — Is Migration or an Update on the Roadmap?
There are a humongous amount of details one sysadmin has to control in order to have a good performing web application like this forums. You can face problems at the virtualization layer, at the OS layer, with the database, with the web server, with the networking, with the storage...
Most sysadmins are far from experts in all those areas at the same time. The very few ones that are all-rounders use to work on very big companies that pay pretty damn good salaries with lots of zeroes. That's because the stakes in those places when there's a problem are world's apart from a bunch of people complaining about sluggishness on a forum about a video game.
We all want to everything we face everyday to work flawlessly; but the expectations for that to happen have to be in balance with the stakes of that thing not working so well as desired. SCS could do it better? Sure. Would that extra effort be worthy? Meeeeeeeh, only they know.
Regards
Most sysadmins are far from experts in all those areas at the same time. The very few ones that are all-rounders use to work on very big companies that pay pretty damn good salaries with lots of zeroes. That's because the stakes in those places when there's a problem are world's apart from a bunch of people complaining about sluggishness on a forum about a video game.
We all want to everything we face everyday to work flawlessly; but the expectations for that to happen have to be in balance with the stakes of that thing not working so well as desired. SCS could do it better? Sure. Would that extra effort be worthy? Meeeeeeeh, only they know.
Regards
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot]